On 13 Dec 2012, at 8:56pm, Jeff Archer wrote:
> I have found that this can be repaired by SQLiteExpertPro by the
> Database | Repair functionality
Worth noting that there's a difference between restoring the database to a
condition where it no longer gives
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jeff Archer <
jsarc...@nanotronicsimaging.com> wrote:
> I have encountered an error of the database disk image is malformed.
> Database was send in by a customer so I'm not exactly sure how it came to
> be this. I have found that this can be repaired by
I have encountered an error of the database disk image is malformed.
Database was send in by a customer so I'm not exactly sure how it came to
be this. I have found that this can be repaired by SQLiteExpertPro by the
Database | Repair functionality but have not been able yet to find anything
in
Hello,
You can give the following tool a try if you want:
https://github.com/gwenn/checkfkey
But I'm not sure that it correctly handles composite.
Regards.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jean-Christophe Deschamps
wrote:
>
>> Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
>> > I can also see
I will sure and report back, I appreciate the response and assistance!
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of LMHmedchem
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:33 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite]
Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> I can also see situations when someone might want to run one
> set or the other set of checks. Breaking it out, so that these
> checks are done by a different PRAGMA (integrity_check_v2 ?) seems
> like a wise idea.
Indeed; with a separate PRAGMA
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:41 PM, bkk wrote:
> Really appritiate if any one can help me on this, I didnot get a solution
> for
> this
>
>
Apparently, nobody else can reproduce your problem. All of our tests are
working fine.
>
> Thanks
> Brijesh
>
>
>
> --
> View this
Really appritiate if any one can help me on this, I didnot get a solution for
this
Thanks
Brijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/malloc-failures-on-ubuntu-tp65936p66126.html
Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have sqlite-jdbc-3.7.2.jar that I use as the sqlite driver for
squirrel-sql. It is 3.1MB, so I don't think I can send it as an email
attachment. You may want to search for that file name. If you can't find
it, let me know and I will put is somewhere on the net for you.
LMH
Tilsley, Jerry
Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> I can also see situations when someone might want to run one
> set or the other set of checks. Breaking it out, so that these
> checks are done by a different PRAGMA (integrity_check_v2 ?) seems
> like a wise idea.
Indeed; with a separate PRAGMA
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jos Groot Lipman wrote:
> When you enable foreign keys *after* you insert records, no guarantee is
> given by SQLite that the foreign key constraints are fulfilled. This may not
> be what most users would want or expect but it certainly not a
11 matches
Mail list logo