On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ben Newberg wrote:
> Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for.
>
Great :). Now that i have some code in front of me i can say, more
concretely, that sqlite3_column_count() is what you want.
https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/column_count.html
--
-
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Ben Newberg wrote:
> Is there a good way to determine if a sql query is either attempting to
> modify a database, or simply querying it?
>
Check the column count of the prepared statement: it will be >0 for a
select or select-like pragma. Anything else is an
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:51, Reinhard Max wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:41, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
>
>> SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY pmuk;
>
> For ordered results you need an ORDER BY clause, and if you want to
> order by a calculated column (count
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:41, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
> SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY pmuk;
For ordered results you need an ORDER BY clause, and if you want to
order by a calculated column (count in this case), you have to give it
a name:
SELECT pmuk,
> users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Scott Hess wrote on
> Thursday, August 06, 2015 1:11 PM
>
> Also consider https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/stmt_readonly.html
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Stephan Beal
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ben Newberg
>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Wade, William wrote:
> I'm an SQLite novice, so if I'm wrong about this, I hope someone will
> correct me.
>
> The first query will be slower than later queries for the reason Simon
> mentioned.
Pedantically speaking, "will" is not quite right. That will
I'm an SQLite novice, so if I'm wrong about this, I hope someone will correct
me.
The first query will be slower than later queries for the reason Simon
mentioned. However, it may still be possible to get some speed up of the first
query, if it can avoid reading stuff not in the result set and
Hi,
the warning which is mentioned in the ticket still occurs also with newer
gcc versions. The ticket was closed after a gcc bug report was opened. The
gcc bug was closed due to a missing testcase.
I had a quick look at the problem and it seems that the warning is right
since in certain context
I have enabled the transitive closure extension and I followed the steps
regarding querying the virtual table mentioned in closure.c file as follows
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE ct1 USING transitive_closure(
tablename='group1',
idcolumn='groupId',
parentcolumn='parentId'
);
"Reinhard Max" wrote...
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:51, Reinhard Max wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:41, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY
>>> pmuk;
>>
>> For ordered results you need an ORDER BY clause, and if you want to
"Reinhard Max" wrote...
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 at 17:41, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
>
>> SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY
>> pmuk;
>
> For ordered results you need an ORDER BY clause, and if you want to order
> by a calculated column (count in this case), you
Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Ben Newberg wrote:
>
> > Is there a good way to determine if a sql query is either attempting to
> > modify a database, or simply querying it?
> >
Hello !
After submitting several emails with subject "Bug in
sqlite3_trace/trigger/delete" and only one reply to then so far I decided to
look a bit more deep on the problem I'm facing using sqlite3 with one
specific database and created a simpler database that can show several
problems and
Is there a good way to determine if a sql query is either attempting to
modify a database, or simply querying it?
In the past, I have used sqlite3_update_hook with good results, but in this
current project, I am looking for a way to determine the type of query even
before the prepared statement
Greetings.
I have this query,
SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY pmuk;
this works but it is not sorted. I tried things like
SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM LSOpenJobs WHERE pmuk LIKE '% %' GROUP BY count(*)
|| '-' || pmuk;
and
SELECT pmuk, count(*) FROM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2015 09:46 AM, Ben Newberg wrote:
> Is there a good way to determine if a sql query is either
> attempting to modify a database, or simply querying it?
You most like want to use the authoriser. It tells you exactly what
the query is doing,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2015 09:27 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
>> Is it using more CPU cycles in mmap mode or just taking longer?
>> If the former, does [time] attribute them to "user" or "system"?
It is taking longer. I have 3 XML dumps which I turn into JSON
If the OP shows us the data base schema, and the select, then perhaps its
performance could be enhanced by changing something. One thing which I
sometimes do is "denormalize" a table by splitting it into two, or more,
tables which are related via a shared UUID value. I put the often used
columns
Anyone know which encryption algorithm is used in System.Data.SQLite?
Seems like it doesn?t use the standard SEE sqlite extension.
Thanks a lot.
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
http://twitter.com/sqlabs
http://instagram.com/sqlabs
Also consider https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/stmt_readonly.html
-scott
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ben Newberg wrote:
>
> > Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for.
> >
>
> Great :). Now that i have some code in front of me i
Hello !
After waiting for any help on this issue I've tried to see what "explain
query plan delete from res_users where id=7" shows and found that on this
particular database because the res_users.id is a foreign key on almost all
other tables and sometimes on more than one field (most of then
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Sairam Gaddam
wrote:
> I have enabled the transitive closure extension and I followed the steps
> regarding querying the virtual table mentioned in closure.c file as follows
>
Given that SQLite supports CTE's now, why use that extension?
AFAIK, it was to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In my testing I am finding that using SQLite's mmap support with
larger databases (final db size is ~10GB) to create the database (WAL
mode) is considerably (about three times) slower than no mmap.
The default max mmap limit is 2GB (sadly). Has
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
> Anyone know which encryption algorithm is used in System.Data.SQLite?
> Seems like it doesn?t use the standard SEE sqlite extension.
>
https://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users at sqlite.org/msg87770.html
--
--
--
--???--
24 matches
Mail list logo
