Am Fri, 19 May 2017 13:36:57 -0400 schrieb Richard Hipp:
> On 5/19/17, Claudio Bantaloukas wrote:
>>
>> Lo and behold, the latest version handled these queries without issue,
>> halved the time it took to run some other queries and has apparently not
>> introduced
Hallo,
I don't think this is a big deal, but probably helpful for one or another:
I tried to compile SQLite 3.19 with MSVC 2005 and got a compile error C2143
at line 143542 of sqlite3.c.
Removing the trailing semicolon from
if( (zKey = sqlite3_uri_parameter(zOpen, "hexkey"))!=0 && zKey[0] ){;
Gunter. Thank you very much for the insightful and detailed answer.
May I ask the obvious and possibly oversimplified question? This is
directed to anyone especially those privy to the worked VTab examples DRH
mentioned.
Suppose the virtual table is merely a light wrapper over backing_table.
While checking something else I came across this.
SQLite version 3.16.0 2016-11-04 19:09:39
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database.
sqlite> PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON;
sqlite> PRAGMA foreign_keys;
1
sqlite>
Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/22/17, Donald Griggs wrote:
>> http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
>>
>> "containing two ore more"
>>
>
> Thank you. And since "ore" is a real word, the spelling checker
> didn't catch this. :-\
Another typo not caught by the
On 5/22/17, Donald Griggs wrote:
> http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
>
> "containing two ore more"
>
Thank you. And since "ore" is a real word, the spelling checker
didn't catch this. :-\
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
"containing two ore more"
Not a complaint, just hoping to be helpful.
Donald
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
On 05/22/2017 09:49 PM, Green wrote:
Hello
I have bug releated to SQLDiff and sqlite3changeset_apply:
Thanks for reporting this. Now fixed here:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/0bb23c48064cc641
Dan.
Here is situation:
- For testing I have simple database with two tables
- I'm
Hello
I have bug releated to SQLDiff and sqlite3changeset_apply:
Here is situation:
- For testing I have simple database with two tables
- I'm running SQLDiff.exe with --changeset option
- Next I'm trying apply patch to database by sqlite3changeset_apply
If I have changes to booth tables
xTom Byars wrote:
> Returns
>
> SEARCH TABLE Tbl USING PRIMARY KEY (ID>? AND ID
> Should that be (ID>=? AND ID<=?)
explain query plan select * from t where x between 1 and 42;
0|0|0|SEARCH TABLE t USING PRIMARY KEY (x>? AND x= 1 and stops with > 42.
The EQP output does not bother to always use
SQLite will determine the set of constraints that are possible against yout
virtual table from the query you are preparing. It will then call your
xBestIndex function a number of times with different subsets of the constraints
marked aus "usable". Your xBestIndex function needs to return (among
11 matches
Mail list logo