Hi,
The latest version of System.Data.SQLite in the download page is
1.0.84.0, which appears to have been done for SQLite version 3.7.15.2.
Is that correct?
If so, is there a plan to update System.Data.SQLite with the latest
SQLite version?
Do Ineed to wait for a later version of System.D
Have you looked at this?
http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2012/08/07/updated-how-to-using-sqlite-from-windows-store-apps.aspx
Thanks for that link. Yes, I have looked at it before.
Just to make it clear, I know that, according to that blog, sqlite-net
will work from Metro and desktop. I also
Hi,
If you have seen this message already, please ignore it. I received
some sort of email about message content type from the forum, and I am
resending it as text just in case.
Currently at my job I am writing code to access SQLite from C# using
System.Data.SQLite. We are also looking at
Hi,
Does System.Data.SQLite support .NET 4.5? The downloadable binaries only come
in 3.5 and 4.0 flavors (although it is possible for assemblies to support
multiple .NET versions).
Thanks,
Nick
___
sqlite-
>>If I am doing something wrong, does anyone have an idea of what it could be?
>It doesn't sound like it.
That's all I was looking for.
Thanks!
Nick
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
round is easy enough, but I am just curious if I have some
setting or something wrong.
Thanks,
Nick
> On 12/16/2009 5:22 PM, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:52:16PM -0500, Nicolas Rivera scratched on the
> wall:
>
>> Thanks for your reply Dr. Hipp.
&
s the main reason for having this function,
but it does not seem to work as I would have expected for that
particular scenario.
Thanks,
Nicolas
> On 12/16/2009 4:14 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Nicolas Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
Hi,
I think I am missing something really simple (some macro or something),
because I cannot make sqlite3_complete() to return anything other than 1.
Even when I pass it "" (an empty string), it still returns 1. I even
tried to call sqlite3_initialize() before (although to my knowledge this
i
mory usage and I/O, why is it
not the default? What is the advantage of not using it?
Thanks,
Nicolas Rivera
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
So then only one write transaction at a time is allowed per database.
Which means there is no advantage, in terms of concurrency, with using
shared cache mode. Right?
> On 11/24/2009 4:17 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
> Indeed, it's weird. And I've just realized that if we have two
> simultaneous
reading uncommitted data.
Thanks in advance,
Nicolas Rivera
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
11 matches
Mail list logo