On 2014-11-26, 7:53 AM, RSmith wrote:
> The fact that inside of SQLite an Integer can be stored in different
> ways is simply a code/data/space optimisation for SQLite, it is
> transparent to the user and transparent to the SQL - it is in no way
> intended as a data-feature or extension of the SQL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-11-21, 12:52 AM, Thane Michael wrote:
> I've been searching for a way to serialize an object's vector using
> sqlite3 but are yet find a working solution. How do I go about
> making it happen, an example would be of great help.
If your goal
On 2014-10-29, 12:13 PM, Mike McWhinney wrote:
System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnThreadException(Exception
e)
at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg,
IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
at
On 2014-10-09, 11:09 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 10/09/2014 07:23 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
On 2014-10-09, 7:32 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
Got it, thanks for the explanation. Just to make sure that I
understand you correctly, is the clause MATCH '*l0l* *h4x*' getting
translated to MATCH 'l0l* h4x
On 2014-10-09, 7:32 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
Got it, thanks for the explanation. Just to make sure that I
understand you correctly, is the clause MATCH '*l0l* *h4x*' getting
translated to MATCH 'l0l* h4x*'?
Yes, that's right.
Dan.
In that case, shouldn't the test in the original post have
On 2014-10-07, 4:04 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 10/08/2014 01:52 AM, Sohail Somani wrote:
Figured it out: match terms should be "l0l* h4x*" NOT "*l0l* *h4x*",
though it did work as expected with the older version. I'd suggest
keeping the old behaviour unless there is a perf
Figured it out: match terms should be "l0l* h4x*" NOT "*l0l* *h4x*",
though it did work as expected with the older version. I'd suggest
keeping the old behaviour unless there is a performance-based reason not to.
On 2014-10-07, 2:49 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
SELECT COUNT
$ ./bin/sqlite3 --version
3.7.17 2013-05-20 00:56:22 118a3b35693b134d56ebd780123b7fd6f1497668
$ ./bin/sqlite3 -batch < /tmp/test.sql
--- 1 ---
0
--- 2 ---
1
$ ./bin/sqlite3 --version
3.8.7 2014-09-30 19:04:41 5ce05757aac80b99c3b2141cd301809f8e28e661
/bin/sqlite3 -batch < /tmp/test.sql
--- 1
On 2014-09-07, 8:26 AM, Joe Mucchiello wrote:
PmaReader *pReadr;
SortSubtask *pLast = >aTask[pSorter->nTask-1];
rc = vdbeSortAllocUnpacked(pLast);
if( rc==SQLITE_OK ){
pReadr = (PmaReader*)sqlite3DbMallocZero(db, sizeof(PmaReader));
pSorter->pReader
On 2014-07-29, 8:23 PM, Will Fong wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
'localtime' and 'utc' modifiers.
Ah! I have not explained my issue properly :) I'm very sorry about that.
I'm using SQLite as a backend to a small website and I have
On 22/06/2014 6:33 PM, João Ramos wrote:
The issue appeared with the following scenario: - using SQLite v3.8.4.3 -
the DB is in WAL mode and running with multi-thread mode - every thread has
a read-only DB connection (using thread-local-storage) - a single DB
connection is shared between threads
On 13/06/2014 4:38 PM, RSmith wrote:
If none of these finds you a culprit, it means your program is the only
thing left to blame. Here we need to start with logging every time you
create a connection and start a query or creating a prepared statement.
Log the handles or object IDs you get back
On 13/06/2014 11:04 AM, RSmith wrote:
On 2014/06/13 15:02, Sohail Somani wrote:
My application's architecture looks roughly like this:
- A main thread which does only database reads
- A dedicated database write thread
I needed to create this because while reads are fast, there are
occasions
Hi,
My application's architecture looks roughly like this:
- A main thread which does only database reads
- A dedicated database write thread
I needed to create this because while reads are fast, there are
occasions where writes take a significant portion of time and that can
cause the main
14 matches
Mail list logo