On Tue May 03, 2016 at 08:33:30AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/2/16, Rolf Ade wrote:
> >
> > Richard Hipp writes:
> >> A change summary for 3.13.0 is at
> >> https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/3_13_0.html
> >
> > Change the temporary directory search algorithm on Unix to allow
> >
On Tue Apr 05, 2016 at 11:56:53PM +0200, R Smith wrote:
>
> On 2016/04/05 11:15 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> >Are we confusing immediate constraints (checked per statement) with
> >DEFERRED constraints (checked at COMMIT time) again?
> >
>
> We might be - though I assume the OP implicated only defe
I wanted to see how SELECT queries within triggers are using indexes
(or not) which of course lead me to https://www.sqlite.org/eqp.html:
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN is most useful on a SELECT statement, but may
also be appear with other statements that read data from database
tables (e.g. UPDA
On Wed Feb 17, 2016 at 06:17:40PM +, David Bicking wrote:
> I have a table
> I? L? V1 1?? A1 2?? A1 3?? A1 4?? B1 5 ? B1 6?? A1 7?? A2 1 ? C2 2?? C
The formatting of this (and your desired results) does not make the
question clear enough. Can you resend with each row on a separate line
and p
On Wed Nov 25, 2015 at 10:45:07AM +, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> REFERENCES foreign-table ( column-name [[, column-name]]) ...
>
> It would be useful if rather than having to specify a column name for
> each item one could specify a fixed value (or perhaps an expression,
> though that might be mo
On Thu Aug 13, 2015 at 10:06:44AM +0200, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
> The new RBU [1] extension, coupled with the new sqldiff utility,
> might be of interest too.--DD
>
> [1] http://www.sqlite.org/rbu.html
Is there a table of contents or index of SQLite extensions somewhere on
the main website?
> This command should behave exactly like ".dump" but without the
> database schema.
I would occasionally find that command useful.
> Here is a small patch that adds ".dumpdata" for "shell.c" in sqlite3.
This mailing list does not accept attachments. Perhaps you can post a
link?
--
Mark La
On Fri Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Seems the correct code is already generated...
Thanks Hick, that shows a bit more detail I didn't think to look for.
It seems that this only works for bind values, as the comparison and goto
statements aren't present when the term is de
> This would potentially allow me to shortcut some largish UNION
> statements.
I should clarify: I don't want to have to force my callers to use their
own if/then/else statements in order to pick a specific query. I want a
single general-purpose query they can call that shortcuts based on a
bind v
9 matches
Mail list logo