> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Eduardo Morras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Dezember 2006 19:44
> An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Betreff: Re: [sqlite] for what reason :memory: is much slower than
> /dev/shm/dummy.db
>
>
> At 09:34 01/12/2006, you wrote:
> >Hi ther
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Dezember 2006 19:59
> An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Betreff: Re: [sqlite] for what reason :memory: is much slower than
> /dev/shm/dummy.db
>
>
> Eduardo Morras wrote:
> > At 09:34 01/12/200
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Dezember 2006 18:06
> An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Betreff: Re: [sqlite] for what reason :memory: is much slower than
> /dev/shm/dummy.db
>
>
> John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi there,
we are on an challanging project with very high requirements on performance.
When doing some debugging we discover, that the sqlite method for creating
an memory-based database is much slower than using e.g /dev/shm on linux or
/tempfs on solaris. (We have measured an 20min performance a
4 matches
Mail list logo