Re: [sqlite] Berkeley DB vs. SQLite for threaded application

2008-01-16 Thread Tomas Lee
On 2008 January 16 (Wed) 04:57:42am PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've got an application that has Berkeley DB embedded in it. I want > > to replace Berkeley DB with SQLite. (I plan to use the 3.5.4 > > almagamation, which is the latest I could find.)

Re: [sqlite] Berkeley DB vs. SQLite for threaded application

2008-01-16 Thread drh
Tomas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got an application that has Berkeley DB embedded in it. I want > to replace Berkeley DB with SQLite. (I plan to use the 3.5.4 > almagamation, which is the latest I could find.) The thing is, this > application uses threads. I know threads are evil,

Re: [sqlite] Berkeley DB vs. SQLite for threaded application

2008-01-16 Thread RaghavendraK 70574
immediately and delete it! * - Original Message - From: Tomas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:54 pm Subject: [sqlite] Berkeley DB vs. SQLite for threaded appli

[sqlite] Berkeley DB vs. SQLite for threaded application

2008-01-15 Thread Tomas Lee
I've got an application that has Berkeley DB embedded in it. I want to replace Berkeley DB with SQLite. (I plan to use the 3.5.4 almagamation, which is the latest I could find.) The thing is, this application uses threads. I know threads are evil, but this application uses them, and there it