D. Richard Hipp schrieb:
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Dennis Cote wrote:
>> Michael Schlenker wrote:
>
> That is correct, but it is not the whole story. Registers have to be
> allocated.
> The canonical way to do this is to increment the Parse.nMem field. Or
> one
> can call
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Dennis Cote wrote:
> Michael Schlenker wrote:
>>
>> The old code did some stowing away of values via OP_StoreMem/
>> OP_LoadMem and
>> those have been replaced by OP_Copy etc. in the register VM. So how
>> many
>> registers are available in the VM to push away
Dennis Cote schrieb:
> Michael Schlenker wrote:
>> The old code did some stowing away of values via OP_StoreMem/OP_LoadMem and
>> those have been replaced by OP_Copy etc. in the register VM. So how many
>> registers are available in the VM to push away some intermediate results?
>>
>
> From
Michael Schlenker wrote:
>
> The old code did some stowing away of values via OP_StoreMem/OP_LoadMem and
> those have been replaced by OP_Copy etc. in the register VM. So how many
> registers are available in the VM to push away some intermediate results?
>
From the documentation at
Hi all,
I'm currently upgrading some stuff from an sqlite 3.2.7 to the new and shiny
3.5.7 and have some VBDE code in there that i need to port too.
As expected the new register based engine does things a bit differently so
I'm a little bit lost on how to use some of the stuff.
The old code
5 matches
Mail list logo
