I must be missing something...why does a read-only database require WAL at all? If you can't update tables then how can you use WAL? Michael D. Black Senior Scientist Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
________________________________ From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Noah Hart Sent: Mon 7/12/2010 2:42 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] Version 3.7.0 delayed. Was: no longer able to use read-only databases? Richard, In thinking about this, consider that if you embed the WAL within the SQLite database itself, past the high-water mark, it would also take case of this problem. Noah Hart On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Matthew L. Creech <mlcre...@gmail.com>wrote: > In testing the latest SQLite snapshot with WAL enabled, it seems that > there's no way to use a database in a read-only location. > The release of SQLite version 3.7.0 will likely be delayed while we try to figure out how to deal with this issue. -- --------------------- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Version-3.7.0-delayed.-Was%3A-no-longer-able-to-use-read-only-databases--tp29142917p29143134.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
