Re: [sqlite] Interop DLL question

2011-05-20 Thread Michael Yeaney
> Meanwhile, perhaps, if you rephrase your goal and post again here on the > list, someone with experience in your environment (I'm NOT one of > those) will respond. I'm _guessing_ that you _don't_ mean to ask for the > xcopy command syntax itself: > Correct - what I'm looking for is the ability t

Re: [sqlite] Interop DLL question

2011-05-20 Thread Kevin Benson
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Michael Yeaney wrote: > For the 1.0.72.0 (3.7.6+) package (x64), is there a stand-alone (mixed > mode) DLL offered anymore that does not require the interop library > (much like the 1.0.66.0 version? Not currently, as Shane mentions (and as quoted from under Bu

Re: [sqlite] Interop DLL question

2011-05-20 Thread Shane Harrelson
Switching to a "single format" greatly simplified things from an "administrative" point of view - giving us a consistent single "packaging" format across all platforms (Windows, Mono, Compact, ARM, etc.) - a support customer even specifically pointed out this made things much easier for them as we

[sqlite] Interop DLL question

2011-05-19 Thread Michael Yeaney
For the 1.0.72.0 (3.7.6+) package (x64), is there a stand-alone (mixed mode) DLL offered anymore that does not require the interop library (much like the 1.0.66.0 version? I'm using SQLite successfully in a few Microsoft Azure deployments, but with the new version, the servers are not able to loca