Hi Bob,
Den 18 maj 2017 9:15 em skrev "Bob Friesenhahn" <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us>:
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>
>> The request is issued early on when the connection is first opened so no
>> actual queries have been issued at that time.
>>
>
> Then my (black-box) guess is that
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kim Gräsman wrote:
The request is issued early on when the connection is first opened so no
actual queries have been issued at that time.
Then my (black-box) guess is that you're seeing the bump from
allocating heap space for whatever structures the schema needs.
Our sch
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small
>>> value)
>>> to attempt to decrease memory usage (and i
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kim Gräsman wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small value)
to attempt to decrease memory usage (and it is reported as immediately
decreased in the shell by .stats) actually signifi
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
> Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small value)
> to attempt to decrease memory usage (and it is reported as immediately
> decreased in the shell by .stats) actually significantly increases heap
> memory usage?
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Simon Slavin wrote:
On 18 May 2017, at 5:10pm, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small value) to
attempt to decrease memory usage (and it is reported as immediately decreased
in the shell by .stats) actually signific
On 18 May 2017, at 5:10pm, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small value)
> to attempt to decrease memory usage (and it is reported as immediately
> decreased in the shell by .stats) actually significantly increases heap
> memory usage?
Does anyone know why using 'PRAGMA cache_size=0' (or some other small
value) to attempt to decrease memory usage (and it is reported as
immediately decreased in the shell by .stats) actually significantly
increases heap memory usage?
I find this to be an interesting phenomena.
Bob
--
Bob Frie
8 matches
Mail list logo