"Salvatore Iovene"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Could you tell me if this kind of JOIN would be very expensive in
> terms of performance?
Why don't you set up a test and measure? It may very well be that the
extra time taken to perform a join is offset by less dis
Hello,
I have a table like this:
INT id
TEXT t1
TEXT t2
For a lot of rows the pair (t1,t2) is the same, so, in order to save
space, it would be better to have two tables like:
INT id
INT pair_id
and
INT id
TEXT t1
TEXT t2
But, in my case, speed is more importan than disk space, and if I did
i
Hello,
I have a table like this:
INT id
TEXT t1
TEXT t2
For a lot of rows the pair (t1,t2) is the same, so, in order to save
space, it would be better to have two tables like:
INT id
INT pair_id
and
INT id
TEXT t1
TEXT t2
But, in my case, speed is more importan than disk space, and if I did
i
3 matches
Mail list logo