Thank you very much. I am happy to hear that the performance I am seeing
is in line with what others have observed. I am running this on Windows
XP.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Akira Higuchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:56:41 -0500 (EST)
> Shane Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:56:41 -0500 (EST)
Shane Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just need to figure out why my performance is about 30x slower than what
> others are reporting when using the library in similar ways.
Are you using sqlite on windows or MacOS X?
As I tested, sqlite
Thank you very much for the feedback. I understand your point, hardware
takes a deterministic amount of time.
I have been basing my assumptions on these sources:
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=PerformanceConsiderations (See
"Transactions and performance")
No, as I mentioned in my original message, I am not wrapping them. I
don't want to test an unrealistic scenario for my application. In my
application, there are multiple sources that will be inserting into the
database and pooling the information for a bulk insert won't work.
I understand that
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Shane Baker wrote:
>I'm sure I must be doing something wrong. This is my first attempt at
>working with SQLite.
We'll see...
>
>I have a simple table, with 7 columns. There are 6 integers and a BLOB,
>with the primary key being on an integer. When I try to run inserts
Are you wrapping the transactions in between Begin/End Transactions?
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
INSERT INTO table (foo) VALUES (bar);
INSERT INTO table (foo) VALUES (par);
INSERT INTO table (foo) VALUES (tar);
INSERT INTO table (foo) VALUES (far);
..
INSERT INTO table (foo) VALUES (car);
INSERT INTO
6 matches
Mail list logo
