On 1/11/62 19:15, mailing lists wrote:
Thanks.
Is there a difference between these statements with respect results,
performance etc. or are both statements describe the same thing?
They're the same in all important respects.
Dan.
a) SELECT * FROM NamesFTS WHERE FTS MATCH
Thanks.
Is there a difference between these statements with respect results,
performance etc. or are both statements describe the same thing?
a) SELECT * FROM NamesFTS WHERE FTS MATCH 'LastName:alpha FirstNames:beta';
b) SELECT * FROM NamesFTS WHERE LastName MATCH 'alpha' AND FirstNames MATCH
On 1/11/62 03:03, mailing lists wrote:
Hi Dan,
I did not know that. What was the reason that it did not work before 3.30?
The implementation of the xBestIndex method of fts3/4, and fts5 prior to
3.30.0, only allowed a single MATCH constraint to be processed and
passed through to xFilter.
Hi Dan,
I did not know that. What was the reason that it did not work before 3.30?
Regards,
Hartwig
> Am 2019-10-31 um 19:16 schrieb Dan Kennedy :
>
>
> On 1/11/62 00:32, mailing lists wrote:
>> For normal tables I can use something like:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM Names WHERE FirstNames=? AND or
On 1/11/62 00:32, mailing lists wrote:
For normal tables I can use something like:
SELECT * FROM Names WHERE FirstNames=? AND or OR LastName=?;
For FTS tables I can only use
SELECT * FROM FTSNames WHERE FirstNames MATCH ? OR LastName MATCH ?; AND is not
supported (still do not know why)
Is
For normal tables I can use something like:
SELECT * FROM Names WHERE FirstNames=? AND or OR LastName=?;
For FTS tables I can only use
SELECT * FROM FTSNames WHERE FirstNames MATCH ? OR LastName MATCH ?; AND is not
supported (still do not know why)
Is there any possibility to use prepared
6 matches
Mail list logo
