Yes. It was sent from an unsubscribed address, queued in the
moderator who looks like they just cleared the queue.
Regards... Matthew
On 10/1/09, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> We solved this yesterday, right ? Is anyone else seeing this a second
>> time ?
>
> Yes. Though date of the second letter co
On Oct 1, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> We solved this yesterday, right ? Is anyone else seeing this a
>> second
>> time ?
>
> Yes. Though date of the second letter correctly shows that it was sent
> 2 days ago I've received it just minutes ago.
When a non-subscriber sends an email
> We solved this yesterday, right ? Is anyone else seeing this a second
> time ?
Yes. Though date of the second letter correctly shows that it was sent
2 days ago I've received it just minutes ago.
Pavel
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Simon Slavin
wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep 2009, at 8:37pm, Tippett
On 29 Sep 2009, at 8:37pm, Tippett, Matthew wrote:
> I would like to highlight the following SQLite benchmark results
> posted
> by Phoronix via Phoronix Test Suite (http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
> )
We solved this yesterday, right ? Is anyone else seeing this a second
time ?
Simon.
Hi,
I would like to highlight the following SQLite benchmark results posted
by Phoronix via Phoronix Test Suite (http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/)
In particular
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2631_kvm&num=3
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Tippett wrote:
> I would like to highlight the following SQLite benchmark results posted
> by Phoronix via Phoronix Test Suite (http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/)
An earlier test showed massive differences for Linux filesystems but those
res
On 29 Sep 2009, at 10:29pm, Matthew Tippett wrote:
> If there is anyone who is interested in assisting in improving the
> quality/value/functional interest of the benchmarks, then please
> advise.
In SQLite, when you know you are making many changes and don't need to
consult the data until you
If there is anyone who is interested in assisting in improving the
quality/value/functional interest of the benchmarks, then please
advise.
PTS can handle direct numerical, average or gemetric means at
individual test case or aggregate test suites.
Regards... Matthew
On 9/29/09, Simon Slavin w
> I cannot find any sign of BEGIN;COMMIT; .
And as a result of that, Matthew, you're right, on OS (or OS + file
system) where fsync() doesn't do physical write test getting huge
boost in performance.
Just take the second test: 12,500 transactions in 771.13 seconds
giving about 16 transactions per
On 29 Sep 2009, at 8:57pm, Matthew Tippett wrote:
> In particular
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2631_kvm&num=3
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=7
>
> In both of these cases, there are configurations where there is an
>
Hi,
I would like to highlight the following SQLite benchmark results posted
by Phoronix via Phoronix Test Suite (http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/)
In particular
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2631_kvm&num=3
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freeb
11 matches
Mail list logo
