On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Wanadoo Hartwig <
hartwig.wiesm...@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, but I thought that there would have been an automatic conversion to
> a float. The comparison is not 1 but a floating point literal like 1.0.
>
I'm thinking you are making other assumptions as
Hi,
sorry, but I thought that there would have been an automatic conversion to a
float. The comparison is not 1 but a floating point literal like 1.0.
Am 12.12.2010 um 03:49 schrieb Richard Hipp:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Wanadoo Hartwig <
> hartwig.wiesm...@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Wanadoo Hartwig <
hartwig.wiesm...@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> take the following SQL statement:
>
> UPDATE tableA SET column1=(SELECT column2 FROM tableB WHERE
> function1(column3) < 1 ORDER BY function1(column3) LIMIT 1);
>
> Actually, this statement does not ma
Hi,
take the following SQL statement:
UPDATE tableA SET column1=(SELECT column2 FROM tableB WHERE function1(column3)
< 1 ORDER BY function1(column3) LIMIT 1);
Actually, this statement does not make sense because the ORDER BY expression
does not fulfill the requirements of an ORDER BY expressio
4 matches
Mail list logo