> Le 24 mars 2016 ? 14:46, Domingo Alvarez Duarte dev.dadbiz.es> a ?crit :
>
> But in this example there is only one application accessing the database and
> only one table with one small record been updated all the time and no active
> readers, why it's writing to wal ?
Because it is engineered
d why not update the same record instead of adding a new one in such
situation ?
I'll try with a bigger record to see what happens.
Cheers !
?
> Thu Mar 24 2016 11:55:11 AM CET from "Domingo Alvarez Duarte"
> Subject: [sqlite] SQLite with wall enabled
>w
Thanks for reply !
The error check was left out intentionally to not pollute the code, I stepped
through all code with gdb to certify it's doing all correctly.
Cheers !
> Thu Mar 24 2016 12:03:28 PM CET from "Stephan Beal"
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite with wall en
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <
sqlite-mail at dev.dadbiz.es> wrote:
> There is something wrong with the program or with sqlite3 ?
>
>
> rc = sqlite3_bind_text(stmt_insert, 1, session_id,
> sizeof(session_id)-1, NULL);
> rc = sqlite3_bind_text(stmt_inse
Hello !
I'm sending here a C program that demonstrates the problem of sqlite3 in wall
mode,
in this simple example of a simulated session management for a web server
when executing
the wall log file will grow and grow till eat all our disk.
?
There is something wrong with the program
5 matches
Mail list logo