Re: [sqlite] Sanitising user input for FTS5 MATCH parameter

2019-12-31 Thread test user
Thanks for the details Dan On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 at 18:40, Dan Kennedy wrote: > > On 20/12/62 22:03, test user wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a search box on a website that uses FTS5/MATCH. > > > > MATCH seems to take its own custom language for matching. > > > > 1. Is it safe to just pass the

Re: [sqlite] Sanitising user input for FTS5 MATCH parameter

2019-12-21 Thread Dan Kennedy
On 20/12/62 22:03, test user wrote: Hello, I have a search box on a website that uses FTS5/MATCH. MATCH seems to take its own custom language for matching. 1. Is it safe to just pass the users query to MATCH ? via the SQLite bind FFI? Users could specify a query that uses excessive

Re: [sqlite] Sanitising user input for FTS5 MATCH parameter

2019-12-21 Thread test user
Yeh but it doesn’t explicitly say anything about how secure it is to pass a string directly to “match”. Other scalar values that are passed to a query via binding are safe as they are just data saved to the DB file. But as the MATCH x string contains a language it is going to be interpreted or

Re: [sqlite] Sanitising user input for FTS5 MATCH parameter

2019-12-20 Thread Jose Isaias Cabrera
test user, on Friday, December 20, 2019 10:03 AM, wrote... > > Hello, > > I have a search box on a website that uses FTS5/MATCH. > > MATCH seems to take its own custom language for matching. > > 1. Is it safe to just pass the users query to MATCH ? via the SQLite bind > FFI? > > - This would give

[sqlite] Sanitising user input for FTS5 MATCH parameter

2019-12-20 Thread test user
Hello, I have a search box on a website that uses FTS5/MATCH. MATCH seems to take its own custom language for matching. 1. Is it safe to just pass the users query to MATCH ? via the SQLite bind FFI? - This would give them full access to the FTS5 matching language. 2. If not, how should I be