That's funny to me...the only other person I know who used the word
'copacetic' was a former team leader in my office, in an email he wrote
years ago. I had to check the dictionary to find out what 'copacetic'
means. I think it's very funny to see the word used again in a software
context.
Bob
On 3/13/08, Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Punkish,
>
> I think after installing the library, and making the path entry in
> the /etc/ld.so.conf (If it is not there), simply running the "ldconfig"
> command will serve your need.
Ya, thanks. That did it. Knowing nothing about Linux, I
Hi Punkish,
I think after installing the library, and making the path entry in
the /etc/ld.so.conf (If it is not there), simply running the "ldconfig"
command will serve your need.
Regards,
Lloyd
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:09 -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> I am not at all conversant with RH Linux
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:55:20PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> right, but for most other programs (and, in fact, as I understand it,
> this is the normal behavior for GNU's autoconf), the default behavior
> is to put everything that matters under /usr/local... that is,
> binaries under
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not at all conversant with RH Linux (RHEL-es3). I have just
> compiled sqlite3.5.6 from amalgamation, and I get the error that
> libsqlite3.so.0 can't be found. I did the following
>
> ./configure
> make && make
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Robert L Cochran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> >
> >
> >> why is it the I had to do the above? Why is LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set
> >> automatically? And, since it wasn't
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
>
>
>> why is it the I had to do the above? Why is LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set
>> automatically? And, since it wasn't set, how come other programs were
>> working fine (assuming that other programs in the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> why is it the I had to do the above? Why is LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set
> automatically? And, since it wasn't set, how come other programs were
> working fine (assuming that other programs in the /usr/local/bin space
> were looking for libs
Did you change your path (in $HOME/.bash_profile) to point to
/usr/local/bin, then log out and log back in again? I think the path
setting may be the real issue.
After changing /etc/ld.so.conf did you run `ldconfig` as root?
Thanks
Bob Cochran
Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
P Kishor wrote:
> the
the following solved it
[01:00 PM] ~$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
[01:00 PM] ~$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/local/lib
[01:00 PM] ~$ sqlite3
SQLite version 3.5.6
Enter ".help" for instructions
sqlite> .q
[01:00 PM] ~$
why is it the I had to do the above? Why is LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set
fwiw, my /etc/ld.so.conf is like so
/usr/kerberos/lib
/usr/X11R6/lib
/usr/lib/pgsql
/usr/lib
/usr/local/lib
/usr/local/arcsde/sdeexe83/lib
/usr/lib/qt-3.1/lib
ld.so.conf (END)
in other words, /usr/local/lib is in it.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:09 PM, P Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am
I am not at all conversant with RH Linux (RHEL-es3). I have just
compiled sqlite3.5.6 from amalgamation, and I get the error that
libsqlite3.so.0 can't be found. I did the following
./configure
make && make install
sqlite3 is place in /usr/local/bin
and libsqlite3.so.0 is placed in
12 matches
Mail list logo
