Re: [sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-20 Thread Jay Sprenkle
On 10/19/06, Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree that it would probably be worth adding a simply note to the documentation for each API function which states the first version of sqlite that made the function available. Can the web pages be set so specific individuals can wiki them?

Re: [sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-19 Thread Dennis Cote
Jay Sprenkle wrote: I didn't read the entire content of the documentation. I looked only at the appropriate sections for the question I had. I see nothing in the following section, or the section that lead me to it, that indicates what versions it applies to: [snip] Simply substitute the

Re: [sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-19 Thread Jay Sprenkle
On 10/14/06, Gunnar Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am 14.10.2006 um 04:40 schrieb Jay Sprenkle: > > The problem is that the function: less_goofy_sqlite3_step(); does > not exist in version 3.1.14. > Nor does the function: sqlite3_extended_result_codes() ; > Mybe you should clean your

Re: [sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-14 Thread Peter Cunderlik
Can you possibly put a version specific copy of the API reference up instead of just a single page? Each time you change it just clone the page and change the new page instead. AFAIK the docs online are the ones for the most recent version of SQLite. The 3.1.14 docs should be in the 3.1.14

Re: [sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-14 Thread Gunnar Roth
Am 14.10.2006 um 04:40 schrieb Jay Sprenkle: The problem is that the function: less_goofy_sqlite3_step(); does not exist in version 3.1.14. Nor does the function: sqlite3_extended_result_codes() ; Mybe you should clean your glasses ;-) the less_goofy_sqlite3_step() function is printed in

[sqlite] documentation on the webserver

2006-10-13 Thread Jay Sprenkle
Good Evening Dr. Hipp, I'd like to request a small change to the web server for sqlite.org. I was trying to get a project working today and stumbled a bit. I think a change to the procedures would have helped me, and will help others. I was using 3.14 and found out about the "goofy interface"