Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz

To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz On Mar 18, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Wilson, Ron P wrote: > OT, but tangentially related... > > Is there any reason why all the dates are a month off in cvstrac > remarks? See

Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz

On Mar 18, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Wilson, Ron P wrote: > OT, but tangentially related... > > Is there any reason why all the dates are a month off in cvstrac > remarks? See for example, the link below in dr.h's reply. That is, > I'm assuming that the anonymous remark on february 18 and dr.h's

Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz

Subject: Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > FYI, a minor bug in sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz in file > sqlite3.pc.in: > > Version: @RELEASE@ => Version: @VERSION@ > > Without this

Re: [sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > I still have no idea what a ".pc" file is or what it is used for.  But > apparently it is very important to some compilers. > I gather it's the latest thing for unixy package management. I guess config scripts

[sqlite] minor config bug sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz

FYI, a minor bug in sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz in file sqlite3.pc.in: Version: @RELEASE@ => Version: @VERSION@ Without this change it won't link with the Redland RDF library. -gregg ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org