I found part of the issue, in switching servers around the test version did not
enable the shared cache... My fault.. however I still recieved a RC 5 on a
different write operation.
Modifed the test_server code to repost the step and all was well. A better
solution however is to cause the
I ran everything through the test_server "server" and get the following
results when using read_uncommitted=1
rc=[5] msg=[database is locked]
when performing a "client_step" against a prepared select
statement.
I'd really like to track this down and find out if my
Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My thought was that if i wanted to perform selects concurrently on SMP
> system I would need 2 threads and each thread would be able to read
> concurrently
>
> I just don't see how this [test_server.c] improves concurrency...
>
It improves write
Hi all,
I have a piece of code that utilizes test_server.c, (master thread)
there are 3 threads, each performing seperate tasks, that get a conection
(shared) and set
PRAGMA read_uncommitted=1.
My understanding is that this would allow each individual thread to
4 matches
Mail list logo