On 02/21/2013 12:31 AM, Rob Turpin wrote:
Dan,
I'm getting an LSM_OK on lsm_close. I attached the writer and reader test
case. If you comment out the lsm_config call that turns off logging, all
the writes get in.
I think the mailing list stripped the attachment. Can you send them
to me direc
Dan,
I'm getting an LSM_OK on lsm_close. I attached the writer and reader test
case. If you comment out the lsm_config call that turns off logging, all
the writes get in.
Thanks,
Rob
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 11:37 PM, Rob Turpin wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
On 02/20/2013 11:37 PM, Rob Turpin wrote:
Yes.
Is it succeeding? Returning LSM_OK?
Dan.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 02/20/2013 05:07 PM, Rob Turpin wrote:
I'm running some performance tests on the lsm storage engine, and an issue
has cropped up for me. I r
Yes.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 05:07 PM, Rob Turpin wrote:
>
>> I'm running some performance tests on the lsm storage engine, and an issue
>> has cropped up for me. I retrieved the sqlite4 code from the repository
>> about a week ago.
>>
>> I'm doing a
On 02/20/2013 05:07 PM, Rob Turpin wrote:
I'm running some performance tests on the lsm storage engine, and an issue
has cropped up for me. I retrieved the sqlite4 code from the repository
about a week ago.
I'm doing a simple single threaded test to see what kind of performance I
can get on wri
I'm running some performance tests on the lsm storage engine, and an issue
has cropped up for me. I retrieved the sqlite4 code from the repository
about a week ago.
I'm doing a simple single threaded test to see what kind of performance I
can get on write transactions. After completing the write
6 matches
Mail list logo