Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Finkenstadt
On 5/15/07, James Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4- > based random

RE: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread James Dennett
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4- > based random (3.3.15) > > "Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Finkenstadt
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the > overflowing addition with 0xff ? > The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result is stored in

Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread drh
"Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the > overflowing addition with 0xff ? > The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result is stored in an unsigned char. Am I to understand that you have a