Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-07 Thread Christian Smith
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, John Dean wrote: >At 13:53 06/07/2005, you wrote: >>On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: >> > I'm using SQLite for the first time... >> > >> > We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. >> > >> >>Why, oh why are you using 2.8.15 when 3.2.2 is known to be

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: > >> I'm using SQLite for the first time... > >> > >> We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. > >> > > > > Why, oh why

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread Derrell . Lipman
"D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: >> I'm using SQLite for the first time... >> >> We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. >> > > Why, oh why are you using 2.8.15 when 3.2.2 is known to be > faster, smaller, and to cont

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread John Dean
At 13:53 06/07/2005, you wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: > I'm using SQLite for the first time... > > We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. > Why, oh why are you using 2.8.15 when 3.2.2 is known to be faster, smaller, and to contain many more features???

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:15 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: > Sorry, I think I was not very clear. > > Valgind report shows a block of memory still reachable, not definitively > lost. This memory seems to be allocated by sqlite for internal use. > > My question is if this memory still rea

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz
Sorry, I think I was not very clear. Valgind report shows a block of memory still reachable, not definitively lost. This memory seems to be allocated by sqlite for internal use. My question is if this memory still reachable can (or should) be deallocated. Gerson Vaz D. Richard Hipp escrev

Re: [sqlite] Memory Allocated

2005-07-06 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson Luís Fontoura Vaz wrote: > I'm using SQLite for the first time... > > We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. > Why, oh why are you using 2.8.15 when 3.2.2 is known to be faster, smaller, and to contain many more features??? The test suite for SQLite (both