Re: [sqlite] Patch Etiquette

2017-02-06 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Ziemowit Laski wrote: > [...] > I DO care about being acknowledged as the author of the patch, however. But you are not the author. You reported the problem, but the actual patches that got applied (http://www.sqlite.org/cgi/src/info/50e60cb44fd3687d,

Re: [sqlite] Patch Etiquette

2017-02-06 Thread Ziemowit Laski
Hi Jens, Yes, I did notice the commit that mentions my name, and am glad for the attribution. What I was getting at, though, is that such attributions should be part of SQLite policy and should happen automatically and every time. To your question, I don't particularly care if I have write

Re: [sqlite] Patch Etiquette

2017-02-06 Thread Jens Alfke
> On Feb 5, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Ziemowit Laski wrote: > > HOWEVER, one thing bothers me: You did not acknowledge my authorship of it. > AFAICT, you NEVER seem to acknowledge third party contributions. Clearly, > I'm not user 'drh’. Like with other open-source projects, I

Re: [sqlite] Patch Etiquette

2017-02-06 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2017-02-05 21:14 GMT+01:00 Ziemowit Laski: > I have another patch in the works which will make > SQLITE_ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT directly accessible from the amalgamation, > but am reluctant to submit it. Well, I submitted such a patch already, some half year ago. You can find the full thread