Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-14 Thread Jeremy Hinegardner
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 05:00:32PM -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > If you sees any problems with the upcoming release, or finds omissions > or errors or ambiguities in the documentation, now would be a very > good time to speak up. Thank you for your attention.

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-14 Thread Virgilio Fornazin
Patch posted to CVSTRAC timeline. Please take a look. Ticket n# 3218 On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Virgilio Fornazin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your quick answer... I'll take a look at it to see and submit a > patch to cvstrac if needed. > > Also, thanks again for this great

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-14 Thread Michael Knigge
> Could be phrased better, but as it is it's perfectly correct. PRAGMA > page_count returns the size of the underlying database, measured in > units of pages needed. Yes, you are right - my fault. Sorry! bye, Michael ___ sqlite-users mailing list

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-14 Thread Mihai Limbasan
Michael Knigge wrote: > See page > > http://www.sqlite.org/draft/doc/35to36.html > > > "Added the page_count PRAGMA for returning the size of the underlying > database file in pages." > > I guess you mean "... the **count**" and not **size**. > Could be phrased better, but as it is

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-14 Thread Michael Knigge
See page http://www.sqlite.org/draft/doc/35to36.html "Added the page_count PRAGMA for returning the size of the underlying database file in pages." I guess you mean "... the **count**" and not **size**. Bye, Michael ___ sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-13 Thread Virgilio Fornazin
Thanks for your quick answer... I'll take a look at it to see and submit a patch to cvstrac if needed. Also, thanks again for this great library. On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:47 AM, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Virgilio Fornazin wrote: > > > These

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-12 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Jul 12, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Virgilio Fornazin wrote: > These mutex changes, with sqlite3_initialize() / finalize() calls, > will > solve that problem reported that SQlite3 doesn't delete Critical > Sections > under MS-Windows VFS ? The new interface is designed to solve problems such as

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-12 Thread Doug
And Section 2.0 has: "Partually or fully disable" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Shawn Wilsher > Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 4:49 PM > To: General Discussion of SQLite Database > Subject: Re: [sqli

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-12 Thread Shawn Wilsher
I believe there is a typo in Section 1.1 in 1.c. You have "filesyste-specific" where I think you mean "filesystem-specific". Cheers, Shawn On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:00 PM, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current plan is to release SQLite version 3.6.0 on Wednesday, >

Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.6.0 coming soon...

2008-07-12 Thread Virgilio Fornazin
These mutex changes, with sqlite3_initialize() / finalize() calls, will solve that problem reported that SQlite3 doesn't delete Critical Sections under MS-Windows VFS ? On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:00 PM, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current plan is to release SQLite version