Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record

2011-08-11 Thread Sumit Gupta
to me, at least worth a try on couple of days efforts. With Regards, Sumit Gupta -Original Message- From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Black, Michael (IS) Sent: 11 August 2011 18:58 To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [

Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record

2011-08-11 Thread Black, Michael (IS)
ite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on behalf of Sumit Gupta [gamersu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:28 AM To: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database' Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record Hello, I have Experience with SQL Server and MySql, but not with SQLite.

Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record

2011-08-11 Thread Alexey Pechnikov
2011/8/11 Sumit Gupta : > 10-10-2011 18:48:42, 10,20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80 .. <48 such entries> Use unixtime (time in seconds) and index on this field and your queries will be fast. You can use single blob as integers array for more compact database. -- Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov. http://pechn

Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record

2011-08-11 Thread Sumit Gupta
:54 To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record Have you ever used SQLite before? 10M records is not a big deal. With experience it should take you less than hour to prove this one way or the other. But that depends on you having experience with databases (i

Re: [sqlite] SQLite with 10M record

2011-08-11 Thread Black, Michael (IS)
Have you ever used SQLite before? 10M records is not a big deal. With experience it should take you less than hour to prove this one way or the other. But that depends on you having experience with databases (indexes) and SQLite in particular (WAL mode, exclusive locking, etc). Without expe