Re: [sqlite] Tcl bindings doc update request

2016-11-22 Thread Rolf Ade
I certainly apologzize, to rise this a third time; I will stop to do it again. Still, I think the documentation of the busy method of the Tcl interface to sqlite http://sqlite.org/tclsqlite.html#busy lacks the information, that the callback procedure will be called with one argument. Rolf Ade

Re: [sqlite] Tcl bindings doc update request

2016-11-09 Thread Rolf Ade
Rowan Worth writes: > On 28 October 2016 at 02:53, Rolf Ade wrote: > >> Another plea, since I'm already writing: It isn't immediate and without >> any doubt clear, how the "timeout" and the "busy" methods play together, >> if both are used. I suspect, the timeout, if given, determines, how long

Re: [sqlite] Tcl bindings doc update request

2016-11-09 Thread Rolf Ade
I apologzize to rise this again, it may have fallen under the radar for some reason. It is minor, too. The documentation of the busy method of the Tcl interface to sqlite http://sqlite.org/tclsqlite.html#busy doesn't tell, that the callback procedure is called with one arg, the "number of times

Re: [sqlite] Tcl bindings doc update request

2016-10-27 Thread Rowan Worth
On 28 October 2016 at 02:53, Rolf Ade wrote: > Another plea, since I'm already writing: It isn't immediate and without > any doubt clear, how the "timeout" and the "busy" methods play together, > if both are used. I suspect, the timeout, if given, determines, how long > it lasts until the busy ca