"Yes and yes."
:)
Alejo
On 10/26/06, Kees Nuyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:23:17 +, you wrote:
> So the question:
> Who will be adversely effected by the new error behavior
> in the sqlite command-line shell?
Not really. I prefer the new behaviour. At t
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:23:17 +, you wrote:
> So the question:
> Who will be adversely effected by the new error behavior
> in the sqlite command-line shell?
Not really. I prefer the new behaviour. At the moment
I have to jump through hoops and scan my make logs to
detect errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So the question: Who will be adversely effected by the new
> error behavior in the sqlite command-line shell? Who is
> using the sqlite command-line shell in scripts in such a
> way that the script will no longer work with the new
> behaviors? Do I need to change the
I don't use the command-line shell, but I'd definitely prefer not to see
a fundamental change in the behavior of any tool I use. The debugging
could get nasty and it's possible that someone using the tool in an
unsupervised script might not notice the problem until after it had done
some damage
4 matches
Mail list logo