D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> In MSVC and in Borland, a signed 64-bit integer is __int64, right?
> What's an unsigned 64-bit integer on those compilers?
>
> Do MSVC and Borland support the "long double" type?
The Borland C++ compiler in C++Builder 6 supports the following types with
the given sizes
D. Richard Hipp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> George Ionescu wrote:
>> What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under
>> Windows:
>>
>> - wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or
>> - start using Visual C++ 2003 ?
>>
> I've made changes so that CVS HEAD should
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:52 AM
> To: Sqlite Forum
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite v3.0 - compiling under Windows
>
>
> In MSVC and in Borland, a signed 64-bit integer is __int64, right?
> What's an unsigned
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
George Ionescu wrote:
Hello SQLite users,
Hello Dr. Hipp,
What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under Windows:
- wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or
- start using Visual C++ 2003 ?
I've made changes so that CVS HEAD should compile under MSVC 6.0.
George Ionescu wrote:
Hello SQLite users,
Hello Dr. Hipp,
What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under Windows:
- wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or
- start using Visual C++ 2003 ?
I've made changes so that CVS HEAD should compile under MSVC 6.0.
Can somebody (who has
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
In MSVC and in Borland, a signed 64-bit integer is __int64, right?
What's an unsigned 64-bit integer on those compilers?
Do MSVC and Borland support the "long double" type?
64-bit integer in MSVC 6.0: Use "__int64" for signed and "unsigned
__int64" for unsigned.
MSVC 2003
In MSVC and in Borland, a signed 64-bit integer is __int64, right?
What's an unsigned 64-bit integer on those compilers?
Do MSVC and Borland support the "long double" type?
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
-
Julian Brierley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
>> Even with Visual C++ 2003 there are problems:
>> VC 13 now supports the 'long long' datatype, but it does not
>> support the '%lld' format specifier.
>>
>> The '%lld' is used by SQLite in non debugging code.
>>
Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
George Ionescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under
> Windows:
> - wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or
> - start using Visual C++ 2003 ?
Even with Visual C++ 2003 there are problems:
VC 13 now supports
> The '%lld' is used by SQLite in non debugging code.
> For example: vdbemem.c function sqlite3VdbeMemStringify()
This is a libc/runtime issue that is common to both VC and gcc running
on windows (i.e., mingw, but perhaps not cygwin). Windows needs the
printf format spec '%I64d' instead of
George Ionescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under
> Windows:
> - wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or
> - start using Visual C++ 2003 ?
Even with Visual C++ 2003 there are problems:
VC 13 now supports the 'long long'
11 matches
Mail list logo