On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Tom Longbotham wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just worked through a similar situation. SQLITE would work
> correctly for selects but would return SQLITE_DONE when selecting
> but the
> record would not get updated when doing an update. To confuse
> matters more
> I
On 8/02/2009 8:33 AM, Simon wrote:
> Difficult to say for sure, but it's possible the Indx of 0 were
> inserted with another type (ie, the string "0" and of course, 0 !=
> "0")
If the column is declared as integer (as the OP said) you need to try
harder than '0' ... not trimmimg leading/trailing
thanks Simon and Igor
Simon wrote:
> Difficult to say for sure, but it's possible the Indx of 0 were
> inserted with another type (ie, the string "0" and of course, 0 !=
> "0")
>
I guess that might have happened.
Igor,
I can't try it anymore, because I already deleted the records,
I'll try to r
"Stef Mientki" wrote in
message news:498dfd12.7080...@ru.nl
> The following statement doesn't seem to work (rows are not removed)
> DELETE FROM [_1_aap] WHERE Indx=0
>
> But selecting another value than zero, does work (rows are indeed
> removed) DELETE FROM [_1_aap] WHERE Indx=1
What does this s
Difficult to say for sure, but it's possible the Indx of 0 were
inserted with another type (ie, the string "0" and of course, 0 !=
"0")
Simon
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Stef Mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm a very happy user of sqlite for about 2 years.
> And as I'm happy for a long time,
>
hello,
I'm a very happy user of sqlite for about 2 years.
And as I'm happy for a long time,
I forgot all tiny details and funny things.
Besides that, I changed from Delphi to Python,
and now I'm in trouble :-(
So I might have version problems,
but that's not the case here,
as I've the same probl
Hello,
I have just worked through a similar situation. SQLITE would work
correctly for selects but would return SQLITE_DONE when selecting but the
record would not get updated when doing an update. To confuse matters more
I could update the record with no problems when using Firefox SQLITE ma
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:55:38 -0500, "D. Richard Hipp"
wrote in General Discussion of SQLite
Database :
>The hot backup API has not yet been released. Look for version 3.6.11.
>
>If you open your database using the special name ":memory:" then it is
>held entirely in memory with no duplication o
On Feb 7, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> В сообщении от Thursday 05 February 2009 02:48:25 D. Richard Hipp
> написал(а):
>> The SQLite core will call the locking methods, but they can be no-
>> ops. The read method can be a no-op too, I suppose, if you are only
>> using
Hello!
В сообщении от Thursday 05 February 2009 02:48:25 D. Richard Hipp написал(а):
> The SQLite core will call the locking methods, but they can be no-
> ops. The read method can be a no-op too, I suppose, if you are only
> using the VFS to make a backup. Oh, and the writes will all be page
10 matches
Mail list logo