But wouldn't you be aware of what the data is you want to transmit anyways?
Sure, it thinks as 1 as a length of 5, but, you'll know that you'll need
to send 4 or 8 bytes.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Scott A Mintz wrote:
> If x is numeric length(x) returns the
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:17:48 -0400, Samuel Adam
wrote:
> SQLite uses its own variable-length integer representation
> internally, occupying between 1 and 64 bits per value; if this is for a
Sorry to reply to my own post; I wish to be precise. By “internally”, I
meant
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:24:57 -0400, Scott A Mintz
wrote:
> Is it possible to construct a query that will tell me the total size in
> bytes of the result set? Specifically, in a messaging protocol that
> returns data we need to fragment the reply and it would be nice
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:35:52 -0400, Stephen Chrzanowski
wrote:
> Couldn't you do something like:
>
> select length(FieldName) from TableName where Condition=True
>
> ?
>
> The result would be the size. Otherwise, the only thing I can think of
Caution: This will return
If x is numeric length(x) returns the length of x expressed as a string.
So the value of length(1 ) is 5, not 2.
-Scott
sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org wrote on 11/03/2010 06:35:52 PM:
> Couldn't you do something like:
>
> select length(FieldName) from TableName where Condition=True
>
>
Couldn't you do something like:
select length(FieldName) from TableName where Condition=True
?
The result would be the size. Otherwise, the only thing I can think of is
just doing a select to get the results you want, then just keep a running
tally on what would need to be transmitted, then do
Is it possible to construct a query that will tell me the total size in
bytes of the result set? Specifically, in a messaging protocol that
returns data we need to fragment the reply and it would be nice to know
how much data or how many packets will be required to send the response.
Thanks,
Richard Hipp writes:
> Try setting:
>
> fossil setting autosync off
>
> before you do the
>
> fossil update
I actually get this from "fossil clone http://sqlite.org/src;, too.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> PF writes:
>
> > You need to set:
> > fossil setting manifest on
>
> Thanks. Now "fossil update" says.
>
> fossil: server says: login failed
>
>
Try setting:
fossil setting autosync off
before you
PF writes:
> You need to set:
> fossil setting manifest on
Thanks. Now "fossil update" says.
fossil: server says: login failed
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> Yes. That's precisely the intended use case. Remember though that the
>> transaction is not really committed until COMMIT statement
>> runs: if your application crashes or machine loses power, all changes to the
>> beginning of the transaction are
> Yes. That's precisely the intended use case. Remember though that the
> transaction is not really committed until COMMIT statement runs: if your
> application crashes or machine loses power, all changes to the beginning of
> the transaction are rolled back, not just those since last
jeff archer wrote:
> I am using SQLite from C++ and I have implemented a class to manager nested
> transactions using savepoints. I have currently implemented as a stack of
> transactions such that the first Begin uses BEGIN IMMEDIATE, while subsequent
> levels use SAVEPOINT
Hi.
I use sqlite in my code for a while now, and at first I parsed all queries each
time, but now I'm migrating my code to using prepared statements (using
sqlite3_prepare_v2
and binding parameters).
At some point I started receiving 'library routine called out of sequence'
error every now
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 05:10:22PM +0300, Alexey Pechnikov scratched on the
wall:
> 2010/11/3 Jay A. Kreibich
> >
> > Why not just use an off-the-self hash cache, like memcached, or an
> > off-the-self hash database, like Redis? Redis even supports an
> > Append-Only write
Hello,
We are running SQLite 3.7.3 on an embedded device and using C API to
interact with the DB. One of our goals is to ensure that the database
on disk never grows past certain size. We open DB connection once and
it stays open for the whole duration of C application. The following
PRAGMAs are
Pavel Ivanov-2 wrote:
>
>
> Yes, it's expected. Column aliases are visible only in GROUP BY/ORDER
> BY/HAVING clauses and outer selects. All other places should use exact
> column expression instead.
>
> Pavel
>
>
Ah, thanks Pavel for the clarification, now it makes sense.
This is a bit
2010/11/3 Jay A. Kreibich
>
> Why not just use an off-the-self hash cache, like memcached, or an
> off-the-self hash database, like Redis? Redis even supports an
> Append-Only write mode (e.g. WAL-ish journal mode).
>
How about power fail or OS crash? As I know, Redis does
I am using SQLite from C++ and I have implemented a class to manager nested
transactions using savepoints. I have currently implemented as a stack of
transactions such that the first Begin uses BEGIN IMMEDIATE, while subsequent
levels use SAVEPOINT T where is a sequentially increasing
Interesting.. thanks.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Jay A. Kreibich
Sent: 03 November 2010 03:44 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Using sqlite's WAL with a hash table store
Hi,
I saw in the timeline that Sqlite developers are working on FTS4.
Great news! :-)
I would like to suggest a couple of fixes.
The following syntax involving two or more words and double quotes
returns an error:
...MATCH 'Electric car -"general motors"'
...MATCH 'Electric car
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Ben Harper scratched on the wall:
> I guess I could actually dump the hash table into a blob.
> I'm also doing something like a bloom filter, and I guess that can just
> as well go into a blob too.. Basically the system is a big cache,
> and it must
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Niemann, Hartmut <
hartmut.niem...@siemens.com> wrote:
> Hello *!
>
> I am investigating using sqlite (with Java) as a readonly database in a
> viewer application.
> One problem is that the database can reside not only on the local hard
> disc, but also on a
>
Hello *!
I am investigating using sqlite (with Java) as a readonly database in a viewer
application.
One problem is that the database can reside not only on the local hard disc,
but also on a
possibly slowly connected remote system that can be contacted only via ftp or
some
proprietary
Thanks - I didn't think of using that. Maybe it's a good fit.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Alexey Pechnikov
Sent: 03 November 2010 11:51 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite]
I guess I could actually dump the hash table into a blob. I'm also doing
something like a bloom filter, and I guess that can just as well go into a blob
too.. Basically the system is a big cache, and it must quickly answer the
question "Do you have this item in your cache?". The cache is going
FTS3 extension is very fast and scalable hash engine. I did test FTS3 up to
400+ millions of record and it's nice.
2010/11/3 Ben Harper
> Hi,
> I know the answer to this question is really "Just try it and see", but I
> want to gauge whether the idea is sane or not before I
On 3 Nov 2010, at 8:30am, Ben Harper wrote:
> I know the answer to this question is really "Just try it and see", but I
> want to gauge whether the idea is sane or not before I spend/waste time on
> the effort:
>
> I want to build a custom hash table DB, and to solve the
>
Hi,
I know the answer to this question is really "Just try it and see", but I want
to gauge whether the idea is sane or not before I spend/waste time on the
effort:
I want to build a custom hash table DB, and to solve the concurrency+durability
I need something akin to a WAL, and SQLite's WAL
29 matches
Mail list logo