On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> > On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
> > You're right concurrency is not outlandish but from the viewpoint of
> > sqlite it was therefore this answer and the link.
>
> Hold on here.
>
> What do you mean "it works
> On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
> > Thanks to you and Richard for the links and info. Concurrency is not
> outlandish to expect, especially when it works in OS X and just not in
> the Ubuntu vm in Travis, but I now understand that these are expected
> problems.
> >
Yuriy,
Thanks for following up. Henrik of TravisCI had said that "We do not use
network filesystems by default. We do use ramfs for some databases, but I
don't think SQLite would use ramfs by default unless you put the database
in an odd location. I'm also fairly sure we don't disable locks in
On 16.08.2013 18:03, Gary Weaver wrote:
Thanks to you and Richard for the links and info. Concurrency is not outlandish
to expect, especially when it works in OS X and just not in the Ubuntu vm in
Travis, but I now understand that these are expected problems.
4 matches
Mail list logo