2015-02-16 15:06:34.811 Log opened. (Time zone: UTC+05:30)
2015-02-16 15:06:34.811 Setup version: Inno Setup version 5.5.2 (a)
2015-02-16 15:06:34.811 Original Setup EXE:
D:\Smita\sqlite-netFx45-setup-bundle-x86-2012-1.0.84.0.exe
2015-02-16 15:06:34.811 Setup command line:
> Nice to know my brainisnot totally
rotted out yet
Working well, better than mine.
RBS
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:49 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> Thanks for testing & reporting back. Nice to know my brainisnot totally
> rotted out yet ;-}
> On Feb 16, 2015 4:41 AM, "Bart Smissaert"
> wrote:
>
>
Yes, both your suggestions work indeed and thank for that.
I prefer the second one as it looks a bit neater and makes it more clear
what is going on.
RBS
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:23 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Bart Smissaert
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I realise that,
Looks like version 1.0.84.0? I don't notice any obvious errors; however, it
might be better to use the current release (1.0.94.0) or the pre-release of
1.0.95.0 instead.
> On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:29 AM, Manoj Sakhare wrote:
>
>
> ___
> sqlite-users
Yes, I realise that, but is there any way to get this sorted with that 47
row at the bottom?
RBS
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> You are attempting to compute 0/0 which is NULL and happens to be smaller
> than 0/47 which is 0.
>
> -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
> Von:
You are attempting to compute 0/0 which is NULL and happens to be smaller than
0/47 which is 0.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bart Smissaert [mailto:bart.smissaert at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Februar 2015 09:49
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Can
Sorry, it looked OK on my side, but I suppose some of the Excel formatting
got through and messed things up.
Simplified it will be:
field1field2 field 3
---
0 47 0
0 00
0 00
and do:
Thanks for testing & reporting back. Nice to know my brainisnot totally
rotted out yet ;-}
On Feb 16, 2015 4:41 AM, "Bart Smissaert" wrote:
> Yes, both your suggestions work indeed and thank for that.
> I prefer the second one as it looks a bit neater and makes it more clear
> what is going on.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Bart Smissaert
wrote:
> Yes, I realise that, but is there any way to get this sorted with that 47
> row at the bottom?
>
?Please forgive me if I make a mistake. It is 04:20 and I can't sleep. If?
the problem is as Mr. Gunter said, then you might want to try one
9 matches
Mail list logo
