Dear sirs:
I want to appology for this message. Initially I want to send to the Lazarus
List, but if anyone has the solution, I will appreciate very much
Thanks
Yours
Ing. H?ctor F. Fiandor Rosario
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:59 am Adam Devita wrote:
>
> This discussion on the nature of undefined behaviour code is
> interesting. I don't know the reasoning, but it seems that VS6 often
> initialized things to 0xcd in debug mode and (usually) had memory
> uninitialized to 0x00 when complied in
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:00:24 -0500
"Marc L. Allen" wrote:
> I don't think compilers "run" your code.
Provided we're talking about a C compiler, you're right. Optimizers
don't run the code, they reason about it.
> The fact that the code never actually allows that path to occur is
> beyond
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:58:52 -0400
Adam Devita wrote:
> I don't know the reasoning, but it seems that VS6 often
> initialized things to 0xcd in debug mode and (usually) had memory
> uninitialized to 0x00 when complied in Release (perhaps 0x00 just
> happens to be what was on the stack or heap).
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:56:57 +0100
"Cezary H. Noweta" wrote:
> On 2016-03-22 00:35, James K. Lowden wrote:
> >[...] An example from Clang's discussion is
> >
> > int i = 10 << 31;
>
> Could you provide a link for that discussion? (Or google's phrase to
> retrieve such link?)
I'm sorry,
> This discussion on the nature of undefined behaviour code is
> interesting. I don't know the reasoning, but it seems that VS6 often
> initialized things to 0xcd in debug mode and (usually) had memory
> uninitialized to 0x00 when complied in Release (perhaps 0x00 just
> happens to be what was
Hello !
It's a sqlite repository clone that follows trunk.
SQLite version 3.12.0 2016-03-22 15:26:03
Enter ".help" for usage hints
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database.
Cheers !
?
> Tue Mar 22 2016 06:23:53 PM CET from
In this case sqlite is compiled with the following flags:
gcc -g -O2 -DSQLITE_OS_UNIX=1 -I. -I/third-party/sqlite3/src
-I/third-party/sqlite3/ext/rtree -I/third-party/sqlite3/ext/fts3
-D_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H -DBUILD_sqlite -DSQLITE_HAS_CODEC=1
-DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS4=1 -DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3
Hello !
After seeing several times work/commits on fts5 I decided to try it on a
table shown bellow, and when trying to populate it I get this error message:
sqlite> INSERT INTO fts_idx_items(fts_idx_items) VALUES('rebuild');
Error: constraint failed
The table has 12,000,000 records and
On 22 Mar 2016, at 4:42pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
> A preview of the change log can be seen at
> https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/3_12_0.html
" ? The query planner considers the LIMIT clause when estimating the cost
or ORDER BY.
? The configure script (on unix) automatically
On 2016-03-22 13:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/22/16, MM wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I can see sqldiff appearing here:
>>
>> https://www.sqlite.org/sqldiff.html
>>
>> and in the downloads page as part of a linux 32bit binary package.
>> Alas I don't see any 64bit package.
>
> The 32bit binaries will run
On 22 March 2016 at 13:28, Alek Paunov wrote:
> On 2016-03-22 13:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/16, MM wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I can see sqldiff appearing here:
>>>
>>> https://www.sqlite.org/sqldiff.html
>>>
>>> and in the downloads page as part of a linux 32bit binary package.
>>> Alas
On 22/03/16 11:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/22/16, MM wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I can see sqldiff appearing here:
>>
>> https://www.sqlite.org/sqldiff.html
>>
>> and in the downloads page as part of a linux 32bit binary package.
>> Alas I don't see any 64bit package.
>
> The 32bit binaries will run
The status board for SQLite version 3.12.0
(https://www.sqlite.org/checklists/312/index) is now active. The
release will occur when all items go green.
The "Pre-Release Snapshot" over at
https://www.sqlite.org/download.html contains the latest code.
A preview of the change log can be seen
Hello,
I can see sqldiff appearing here:
https://www.sqlite.org/sqldiff.html
and in the downloads page as part of a linux 32bit binary package.
Alas I don't see any 64bit package.
Given a distro-installed 64bit sqlite binary and libs, which part of the
sources would 1 need to download only
I don't think compilers "run" your code. When looking for uninitialized
variables, it simply looks for a potential path through the code that uses a
variable without it being initialized.
The fact that the code never actually allows that path to occur is beyond the
scope of most compilers,
It may be pedantic, but VS2016 will stop complaining if you edit your
definition of s to
large_struct s=new large_struct(); //set s to an actual instance of
large_struct. c people can think of s as a pointer, and in c# the
members are set to their default values.
J Decker's point could also have
Hello,
On 2016-03-22 00:35, James K. Lowden wrote:
>[...] An example from Clang's discussion is
>
> int i = 10 << 31;
Could you provide a link for that discussion? (Or google's phrase to
retrieve such link?)
-- best regards
Cezary H. Noweta
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:36 AM, James K. Lowden <
> jklowden at schemamania.org> wrote:
>
>> Roger's APSW is SQLIte specific. It's pretty easy to imagine, isn't
>> it, that
>>
>> char sql[] = "select [col] from [foo]";
>>
>>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:36 AM, James K. Lowden
wrote:
> Roger's APSW is SQLIte specific. It's pretty easy to imagine, isn't
> it, that
>
> char sql[] = "select [col] from [foo]";
>
> is easier for him to use than
>
> char sql[] = "select \"col\" from \"foo\"";
>
> even if
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Adam Devita wrote:
> It may be pedantic, but VS2016 will stop complaining if you edit your
> definition of s to
> large_struct s=new large_struct(); //set s to an actual instance of
> large_struct. c people can think of s as a pointer, and in c# the
> members are
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Scott Doctor wrote:
>
> It is uninitialized. you are setting an initial value within an if
> statement. For the compiler, the code has NOT actually executed. so it does
> not use the value of the variable arbitrary_true_false. If it was a #define
> then it would
On 3/22/16, MM wrote:
> Hello,
> I can see sqldiff appearing here:
>
> https://www.sqlite.org/sqldiff.html
>
> and in the downloads page as part of a linux 32bit binary package.
> Alas I don't see any 64bit package.
The 32bit binaries will run fine on 64bit machines.
>
> Given a
It is uninitialized. you are setting an initial value within an if
statement. For the compiler, the code has NOT actually executed. so it
does not use the value of the variable arbitrary_true_false. If it was a
#define then it would use the value but still give an error because it
is not a
hi , i m use sqlite 3.8.10.2 on suse 11 with jdk 1.8 jni, when i create much
more tables,eg 200k, it can easily found the memory leak when close runed, but
when i try linux native c code, it qppears correctly, it really confused me ,
could anybody tell the diffrence from jni runtime between
25 matches
Mail list logo
