> Am 22.05.2017 um 23:52 schrieb Wolfgang Enzinger :
>
> Hallo,
>
> I don't think this is a big deal, but probably helpful for one or another:
>
> I tried to compile SQLite 3.19 with MSVC 2005 and got a compile error C2143
> at line 143542 of sqlite3.c.
I run into the same issue with VS 2008.
Am Fri, 19 May 2017 13:36:57 -0400 schrieb Richard Hipp:
> On 5/19/17, Claudio Bantaloukas wrote:
>>
>> Lo and behold, the latest version handled these queries without issue,
>> halved the time it took to run some other queries and has apparently not
>> introduced any new issues.
>>
>
> It's alw
Hallo,
I don't think this is a big deal, but probably helpful for one or another:
I tried to compile SQLite 3.19 with MSVC 2005 and got a compile error C2143
at line 143542 of sqlite3.c.
Removing the trailing semicolon from
if( (zKey = sqlite3_uri_parameter(zOpen, "hexkey"))!=0 && zKey[0] ){;
Gunter. Thank you very much for the insightful and detailed answer.
May I ask the obvious and possibly oversimplified question? This is
directed to anyone especially those privy to the worked VTab examples DRH
mentioned.
Suppose the virtual table is merely a light wrapper over backing_table. I
While checking something else I came across this.
SQLite version 3.16.0 2016-11-04 19:09:39
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database.
sqlite> PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON;
sqlite> PRAGMA foreign_keys;
1
sqlite>
Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/22/17, Donald Griggs wrote:
>> http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
>>
>> "containing two ore more"
>>
>
> Thank you. And since "ore" is a real word, the spelling checker
> didn't catch this. :-\
Another typo not caught by the spelling checker
in the
On 5/22/17, Donald Griggs wrote:
> http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
>
> "containing two ore more"
>
Thank you. And since "ore" is a real word, the spelling checker
didn't catch this. :-\
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqli
http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_19_0.html
"containing two ore more"
Not a complaint, just hoping to be helpful.
Donald
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On 05/22/2017 09:49 PM, Green wrote:
Hello
I have bug releated to SQLDiff and sqlite3changeset_apply:
Thanks for reporting this. Now fixed here:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/0bb23c48064cc641
Dan.
Here is situation:
- For testing I have simple database with two tables
- I'm runnin
Hello
I have bug releated to SQLDiff and sqlite3changeset_apply:
Here is situation:
- For testing I have simple database with two tables
- I'm running SQLDiff.exe with --changeset option
- Next I'm trying apply patch to database by sqlite3changeset_apply
If I have changes to booth tables sqlite
xTom Byars wrote:
> Returns
>
> SEARCH TABLE Tbl USING PRIMARY KEY (ID>? AND ID
> Should that be (ID>=? AND ID<=?)
explain query plan select * from t where x between 1 and 42;
0|0|0|SEARCH TABLE t USING PRIMARY KEY (x>? AND x= 1 and stops with > 42.
The EQP output does not bother to always use th
Returns
SEARCH TABLE Tbl USING PRIMARY KEY (ID>? AND ID=? AND ID<=?)
Results would certainly suggest so.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
SQLite will determine the set of constraints that are possible against yout
virtual table from the query you are preparing. It will then call your
xBestIndex function a number of times with different subsets of the constraints
marked aus "usable". Your xBestIndex function needs to return (among
13 matches
Mail list logo