This is a known issue and it has an open ticket:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/tktview?name=23b2128201.
Pavel
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to get more info when I get a constraint failed error
> from the C API?
> I am interested in the column na
> Don't use sqlite3_exec. Use sqlite3_prepare16 (which accepts wchar_t*),
> sqlite3_step, sqlite3_finalize. Read text from columns with
> sqlite3_column_text16 (which returns wchar_t*).
I'd say it's not exactly this way. AFAIK, wchar_t on Linux is
32-bit, but sqlite3_column_text16 will return 16
t; On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> > If you have one reader and many writers, consider PRAGMA
>> journal_mode=WAL;
>>
>> Richard meant "one writer and many readers" of course.
>>
>> >> If the other process opens t
> If you have one reader and many writers, consider PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL;
Richard meant "one writer and many readers" of course.
>> If the other process opens the db connection as read_only, will the hot
>> journal check be still done (during queries operations of the second
>> process)?
>>
>
> Journal mode is WAL
I believe in-memory database can't have journal mode WAL. So you
compare completely different settings.
Pavel
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:15 AM, wrote:
>
> Journal mode is WAL
>
>
> --Original Message--
> From: Roger Binns
> Sender: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
> What could be a possible explanation for this behaviour?
> One difference int configurations is that the sqlite lib is built for
> multithreading in the tmpfs scenario.
Could it be an overhead of mutexes?
Make tests with the same SQLite library. Run test with tmpfs using
strace to see if files
> Am I missing something here or if I want to prevent this, is my only option
> to modify our build of SQLite to open the file for exclusive access?
Yes, opening with exclusive access is the only option for you. But
with latest SQLite version you don't have to modify SQLite sources for
that. You
If you configure and compile sqlite3 command line yourself and your
system have readline installed then yes.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
> Is it possible to edit commands entered on the sqlite3 command line?
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> sqlite
> as part of an embedded system build, i'm building a number of tools
> for the *host* system, including sqlite-3.6.7 from the tarball (along
> with a few patches which i will be examining shortly).
Apparently you are building from canonical sources. Why don't you use
amalgamation? It's much easi
> is there a way to create more then one sqlite connection hadles for the
> same in-memory database?
No.
> There was a proposal:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg35438.html
> from Markus Lehmann.
> Is this a safe sollution?
I guess if it's not in the mainline SQLite it's
> So you can copy any block of memory you have a handle for into that, use
> SQLite to manipulate the data while it's in memory
Simon, could you elaborate what you meant by that. To my knowledge you
can't just copy any block of memory into SQLite and make it treat this
memory block as database. D
> I'm starting to get the impression that the only way for me to do this
> is to make my own vfs layer...
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3839158/using-sqlite-with-stdiostream
Yes, this is the best way you can do it. Other option is to take that
data, save it to some temporary file and then o
> I can only control the databases and the libsqlite.so.
> Is everything clear?
How do you do that, I wonder? Why do you think that applications you
don't control will always use your libsqlite.so? They may not use
libsqlite.so at all (compile SQLite sources into application) or use
whatever libra
> Is anyone aware of another technique for preventing interactive mode from
> running? I've seen this method:
>
> Sqlite3 -init new.sql new.db .exit
How about
sqlite3 new.db ".read new.sql"
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Marvin Bellamy
wrote:
> I want to run sqlite3 from a script (ac
> could the next query use the tsamov_code index ??:
> select * from tsamov where tsamov_code like 'AFG%'
Only after
pragma case_sensitive_like = true;
Read more about it here: http://www.sqlite.org/optoverview.html#like_opt.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Sebastian Bermudez
wro
> If I was to attach a database located in a file on disk to a database located
> in memory, would the file DB be loaded in memory too, or would its usage
> remain disk-based?
Its usage would be the same as if you open a new connection to that
database file, i.e. disk-based (barring the page cachi
> Now what surprises me is that this optimization is not done
> automatically by SQLite.
> I suppose I just over estimate the capabilities of the SQLite plan generator.
> Or, would this be something that could be improved?
It's very non-obvious optimization and I think other type of
optimization w
http://www.sqlite.org/compile.html#omitfeatures
Make sure you read all important notes and tested your app thoroughly.
Pavel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> I assume this is the same for sqlite3.dll or sqlite3.lib, but if not, I am
> interested in sqlite3.o (mingw32)
x27;m assuming this is not a regular pattern that has an idiomatic workaround?
>
> Ben
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
> [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Ivanov
> Sent: 07 July 2011 05:18 PM
> To: Gener
> Is there something special one needs to do in order to drop a table from
> inside a user-defined function?
>
> To test, I call it simply like so:
> SELECT my_function();
It shouldn't be ever possible to change the database from within a
function called from SELECT statement. SELECT query doesn'
> Any idea? Please, anyone can help me?
How did you put your data into database? I guess you did that with
command line utility. And as your console wasn't set to have UTF-8
charset then contents of pais now is not in UTF-8. But jdbc driver
tries to treat it as UTF-8 and so you don't see what you
nt too.
> I'm only interested in the results of BETWEEN when you're looking at x1 and
> x2 from the pos order perspective
> ie doing the BETWEEN query on 'x1' and 'x2' would be useless from the rowid
> perspective/order.
> I'll write a better descripti
BETWEEN 'x1' AND 'x2')";
> //bit for t_y omitted.
> in the hope that (SELECT * from t_x ORDER BY pos) presents it's results to
> SELECT BETWEEN in pos order.
> I am concerned about having to specify both xpos and pos and am n
as to be in there somewhere.
> It strikes me that
> SELECT pos FROM t_x WHERE txt BETWEEN 'x1' AND 'x2'
> needs to be operating on the results returned by
> SELECT * FROM t_x BY ORDER BY pos
> ie another level of query is required but I'm not sure of how you
> > Yes. What's wrong with that?
>
> Nothing at all - I just needed to know whether that was the case so I
> could design certain sections of my code accordingly.
Three question marks of yours suggested me that you think it's awfully wrong.
Note that although your function and application pointe
existing
> ones or at least make it look like that even if the records are physically
> appended to the tables.
> Hope this clarifies things and look forward to your thoughts.
>
>
> On 1 July 2011 15:30, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> >> Putting the 'ORDER BY' clau
> To put it another way, if I call sqlite3_create_function to install a
> custom function, is that function now available to all threads using
> SQLite or is it available only to the thread that made the
> sqlite3_create_function call?
Yes, it's available to all threads using the same connection.
>> Putting the 'ORDER BY' clause in view won't work?
>
> It will work just fine, in that the results you see will appear in the ORDER
> you asked for.
I believe that's not always true and is not required by SQL standard.
Most probably 'select * from view_name' will return rows in the order
writte
> This has to run as fast as possible. A left join between these tables is too
> slow, for 10.000 entries it takes around 15 seconds just to navigate through
> the cursor, if I add a where clause selecting only one kind of data then it
> reduces to less than 5 seconds which is acceptable.
What kin
> Just thought I should add that the problem seems to be gone with the
> just released version 3.7.7, but it's not mentioned in the release notes.
It's not in release notes but it's in the timeline. See
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/91e2e8ba6f and
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/0b3174e0b1.
Pave
> there are no statements open, as far as i can see.
Your eyes can miss something. Does sqlite3_close return SQLITE_OK or
something else?
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Thorsten Kersting
wrote:
> there are no statements open, as far as i can see.
>
> On 06/22/2011 05:
Do you check result code of connection closing? Is it successful?
If it's not successful then some statements are still active and
reading transaction is still open. That could be the reason of error
in write process.
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Thorsten Kersting
wrote:
> i use ope
> Can some one help me why the disk I/O error occured during the
> sqlite3_prepare() statement ?
Because while preparing the statement SQLite must read schema from the
database. And although in case of integrity check it's not really
necessary I think it's still the general rule and is done befor
> strcpy(DBEnginePath, "Macintosh HD:Applications:Adobe InDesign
> CS5:Plug-Ins:WPC_ID:IndexData.db");
Try to change path here to "/Applications/Adobe InDesign
CS5/Plug-Ins/WPC_ID/IndexData.db".
Pavel
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:08 PM, john darnell
wrote:
> Sorry to send this twice, but I re
Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Pavel Ivanov:
>
>> To answer your original question: if you disable shared cache, start
>> reading transaction on one connection and start writing transaction on
>> the other connection then you'll be able to read o
> Hmm... unless read_uncommited is persistant somehow; looks like if I
> just don't try to use shared cache it works... I thought I had
> disabled cache before alone and still got the same results...
read_uncommitted works only when shared_cache is on.
To answer your original question: if you dis
IIRC, there was a bug in enforcement compound foreign keys where one
of columns is primary key and it was fixed. So if you take the latest
SQLite version I guess you won't see this problem.
Pavel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Max B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please consider this (working) schema
> So my next question is then, given that I have some data coming in, in
> a random order, and I want an index. What can I do in order for the
> performance to be better?
Create index only after all data is populated.
BTW, this kind of questions will be answered best on a sqlite-users
list. sqli
> I know that I should avoid such things, but just curious, is it something
> inside sqlite that probably makes one dynanmically linked and other
> dynamically loaded library share global data and can this be avoidable?
No, it's Linux linker who works like that. If you have several
libraries loade
> Is there any way to do something along the lines of PRAGMA
> some_command(SELECT * FROM table1 JOIN table2) and have it return A, B, C,
> a, b, c as the headers?
If you insist on getting results as resultset then there's no way to
do that. But you can do the similar thing by using API like
sqlit
> The main issue for me here is that the +1 is inside the string '+1 month'
> and i thus cant use a subquerry of the type SELECT date('now','+(SELECT id
> FROM table) month');
You can do like this:
SELECT date('now','+' || (SELECT id FROM table) || ' month');
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:42
s For Windows" on the download page?
> Should I re-compile SQLite with the same framework than the one used for
> my application?
>
> Thanks for your support
> Cyrille
>
>
> Le 31/05/2011 15:57, Pavel Ivanov a écrit :
>> I would ask one more question: do they have
o, should the WAL file shrink back to 0 then? We're issuing "PRAGMA
> wal_checkpoint" to the open DB handle.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>>> (Actually, that was another general question we had, should that WAL
>>&
l try to catch
> the WAL size and see if it changes dramatically.
>
> (Actually, that was another general question we had, should that WAL
> file ever shrink during use? Why would it grow to that size at all?)
>
> -Eric
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Pavel Ivanov w
> DB file in WAL mode, checkpointing done every 5 seconds by separate
> thread in program
Depending on the mode of checkpointing you use it can fail if there
are some other reading or writing transactions in progress. And at the
time you observe very long rollback actual checkpointing happens
beca
06-02 12:31:59|COMPLETE|md|2011-06-02 07:02:25
> 727|automatedTest_1306496245310334336328084528|2011-06-02
> 12:24:48|COMPLETE|md|2011-06-02 06:55:29
> 726|automatedTest_130648151940731961056560|2011-06-01
> 12:30:33|COMPLETE|md|2011-06-01 07:01:04
> 725|automatedTest_130651279595
rote:
>>
>> The returned value is displayed to the user. We are not storing back the
>> returned column.
>>
>> Sridhar
>>
>> On 02-06-2011 19:28, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> but is returning the value stored in the database when exe
> but is returning the value stored in the database when executed
> as a part of a java program. Can anyone help me if I am missing
> something here ?
Looks like your java program runs with a different locale than SQLite
Manager. I'm not sure why it thinks that you are in a UTC timezone.
Maybe th
> I did try sending a mail over the dev-list, but got no reply. Could
> someone tell me how it should be done?
You should send it here with the exact steps of reproducing the bug.
Hopefully your tool is not code analyzer because "potential bugs"
without any real life steps to catch it won't be pa
> CREATE TRIGGER ts_update after update on ip_timestamps when
This means that your trigger fires after each UPDATE statement. But
> I'm adding/updating records with statements like:
>
> INSERT OR REPLACE into ip_timestamps VALUES ( "182.71.33.222" , 1306932777 );
you do INSERT statements, so you
ent to
read uncommitted data in the same transaction.
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
> On 6/1/2011 1:47 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>>> Actually, you do know what SQLite does without knowing the internals. It
>>> claims to be serializable and
can find a link on sqlite.org for you
when I have some spare time).
Pavel
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
> On 6/1/2011 1:23 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 7:12pm, Jan Hudec wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:17:02 -0400, Pavel Ivan
> From within a BEGIN TRANSACTION and END TRANSACTION block, should I not
> update the same row in a table more than once?
You can update it as many times as you need.
> What are the exact limitations on what I can do during a Transaction?
Do not update a table if there is some select statement
I would ask one more question: do they have the same Windows and .NET
Framework version as you have? AFAIK, Windows and .NET specifically
are very picky on all dlls versions. So if for example you have
SQLite.Interop.dll compiled with a newer .NET Framework and manifest
in it requires your version
> Here are two errors out of the 1200+ errors generated (I tried to include as
> much information as possible to help identify the problem. Please forgive if
> I am overdoing it...):
>
> Compiling /.../sqlite3.c
> Error:invalid conversion from "void *" to "char *"
> This err
> 2.) I moved SQLite3.c and SQLite3.h into my source folder and added them
> to the project. I made no changes to the code nor did I do anything special
> when I added them to my project (i.e. I did not set any special compile
> flags-I simply added the two files to the project).
> 3.)
> I can use two left joins. While writing the first left join, I discovered
> that it is behaving like an inner join.
>
> select *
> from test a
> left join test b on a.component = b.component
> where a.machine = 'machine1'
> and b.machine = 'machine2';
By the WHERE condition you limit result
without
issuing this command then it can't be used with SQLite.
Pavel
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
> Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>>> If I try to query database existence using Linq's "DatabaseExists" I get
>>> a NotImplemented except
> If I try to query database existence using Linq's "DatabaseExists" I get
> a NotImplemented exception in the sqlite ChangeDatabase function - which
> doesn't make sense to me.
SQLite doesn't have a notion of server containing several databases.
That's why it makes perfect sense that SQLite doesn
tioned I should be using SQLite-specific mechanisms to achieve the same
> results. I am just trying to understand how to do that. Pthread_rwlock()
> works fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> --- On Tue, 5/24/11, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> From: Pavel Ivanov
>>
> I have all writes in transactions. If I deactivate my pthread_rwlock() that
> enforce the above, several writes fail with a "database locked" error (I
> assume it is returning SQLITE_BUSY).
>
> So how do I implement the equivalent of a pthread_rwlock() using SQLite
> mechinisms?
When SQLITE_
> Is there a rationale for allowing such statements or is that an effect
> of the 'Lite' nature? (Note: I'm not complaining, just asking.)
I believe that's an effect of the "typeless" design. As SQLite doesn't
have strict type names for columns it accepts pretty much anything for
that. So in your
gt; from ab where ab.a_id2 = 1 and ab.b_id = 1) ;
> 1|1
> 1|2
> 2|1
> sqlite> select aa.* from aa ar, ab ab1, ab ab2;
> Error: no such table: aa
> sqlite> select aa.* from aa as ar, ab ab1, ab ab2;
> Error: no such table: aa
> sqlite>
>
> At this point I got
> I need help to build a statement in order to select all days free from
> events in a specific time range.
This kind of task should be implemented in your application. SQL
wasn't intended for and can't solve such tasks.
Pavel
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Danilo Cicerone wrote:
> Hi to al
> That is, is leaving it to the
> query optimiser to figure out that I only need the sub select once the
> best thing to do?
AFAIK, SQLite's optimizer is not that smart to collapse two identical
sub-queries and reuse once generated result.
> Is the select I'm doing where both a_id1 & 2 are "in" t
> I'm still not 100% sure if there's a problem sharing connections across
> threads with SQLITE_OPEN_NOMUTEX as long as I guarantee that they aren't
> concurrent. I suspect there aren't, but I'm not 100% sure. Any case where
> sqlite3 would be less than happy that pthread_self wasn't always the
stablished than the later.
>
> Again thanks for the information and I apologize for taking up so much list
> bandwidth. I hope others can benefit.
>
> John
>
> --- On Thu, 5/12/11, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> From: Pavel Ivanov
>> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Common Multi
> SELECT categories FROM myTable WHERE (","||categories||",") LIKE "%,7,%";
>
> but I'm guessing LIKE isn't as efficient, and the query is more
> awkward. Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks!
This LIKE is the only way to get information from your table. But you
can do it more efficiently by
in the discussion...
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 17:58:40 -0400
> Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> There's no dependency between different prepared statements, but there
>> is dependency between transactions as they use the same database. And
>> transaction cannot be finishe
select prepared statement will lock the DB from other threads
> (or is it DB connections?) but not the current thread (or is it DB
> connection).
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> John
>
> --- On Thu, 5/12/11, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> From: Pavel Ivanov
>> Sub
> Interesting is the impression I had with prepared statements was the reset
> was only necessary if you wanted to reuse that statement. Since each each DB
> connection is in its own instance of a class (with it own set of prepared
> statements) I would not think there would be any dependency o
> "After a BEGIN EXCLUSIVE, no other database connection except for
> read_uncommitted connections will be able to read the database and no other
> connection without exception will be able to write the database until the
> transaction is complete."
>
> This tells me that reads outside of a tran
> I can't trully construct sql statement piece by piece with SQL
> db as I did with Oracle. Just wanted to confirm.
Why do you need to construct SQL specifically with db's tools? Why
can't you do that in your host language?
Oracle needs dynamic SQL feature because it will work much faster than
the
> Therefore, the second insert fails on every database system i ever
> encountered.
Apparently you didn't encounter Oracle. In such situation Oracle
freezes transaction B until transaction A is committed or rollbacked.
After that it knows what to return to transaction B - error or success
corresp
>> 00:01 Transaction A: BEGIN
>> 00:02 Transaction B: BEGIN
>> 00:03 Transaction A: INSERT INTO test VALUES (1) // works okay
>> 00:04 Transaction B: INSERT INTO test VALUES (1) // aborts with 'duplicate
>> key' error! why???
>
> I get SQLITE_BUSY "database is locked" at this point, as I would exp
> Is this true, or is the memory usage pretty much similar?
Until you reach limit set by 'pragma cache_size' memory usage would be
the same for in-memory database and on-disk database. When the size of
your database grows beyond 'pragma cache_size' in-memory database
starts to consume more memory
> My understanding of the shared cache model was that it just ist intended
> for solving our problem by relaxing the locking a little and that there
> should not be any mutexes at all when using the uncomitted read mode.
>
> Have I missed anything?
Yes, you are involved in a "magical" thinking. Al
> sqlite> select * from a where a=10 group by b;
> 10|1
> 10|2
> sqlite> select * from a where a=11 group by b;
> 11|2
> 11|3
>
> How can I do count equivalent of such a query to find out how many
> distinct values of b there are for a given a? (That is get an answer of
> 2 in the above)
select co
>> Any other chance to speed this up (apart from the obvious "optimize the
>> query, do not use distinct on large tables)=
>
> Without seeing the query or database schema? Not really... Depending
> on the exact query an index on "xyz" might help.
Another suggestion could be to turn off shared
> The problem is that I would like to avoid splitting the query into two parts.
> I would expect SQLite to do the same thing for me automatically (at least in
> the second scenario), but it does not seem to happen... Why is that?
In short, because SQLite cannot read your mind.
To understand the
I believe any compilation options that require changes in SQL parser
require compiling from original sources as well. They cannot be used
with amalgamation file which has already generated SQL parser's code.
Pavel
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:05 PM, jeff archer wrote:
> I am attempting to compile
>> which suggests that referring to rowids is fine.
>
> It does not suggest referring to ROWIDs is fine, it only says that it
> can be done. I think Pavel's point is that referencing ROWIDs is bad
> practice, so that is why he says you shouldn't do it.
Yes, that's right. You can refer to rowid, b
> After more poking, it appears that rowids might not be changed by a vacuum if
> I have an index on the table. Is this true? If so, is it something I can rely
> on going forward?
No, it's not true. The only way to keep your rowids intact is to
declare an INTEGER PRIMARY KEY alias for it. And yo
> REQ3 is a problem because you have mixed signs in INV and only one record in
> REP
>
> How would I craft a query to return REQ3?
Could be something like this:
select INV.REQ,
count(case when INV.AMT > 0 then 1 else null end) positive,
count(case when INV.AMT < 0 then 1 else null end) negative,
date and/or time."
It won't be your local time.
Pavel
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Fabio Spadaro wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 2011/4/22 Fabio Spadaro
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> 2011/4/22 Fabio Spadaro
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>>
>>&g
avel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Fabio Spadaro wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 2011/4/21 Pavel Ivanov
>
>> > Does not work on python with sqlite3 module
>>
>> What does "SELECT sqlite_version()" gives you in python with sqlite3
>> module?
>&
> Does not work on python with sqlite3 module
What does "SELECT sqlite_version()" gives you in python with sqlite3 module?
Pavel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Fabio Spadaro wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 2011/4/21 Black, Michael (IS)
>
>> create table t (d default CURRENT_DATE,i number);
>> insert into
It's not related to the list but still...
> Technically, the data referred to is as follows. An iPhone logs details of
> which phone base stations it connects to, and the 'status' data obtained from
> the base station when it was connected. The location (long & lat) of the
> base station is p
Whenever you have doubt like that just go to
http://www.sqlite.org/lang.html and see if the statement you are
trying to execute exists there and what its correct syntax is.
Pavel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
> Is LOCK TABLE statement supported by by SQLite? I am getting syntax err
> Does anyone one know how to build sqlite to get the same binary as on
> download page ?
Did you try to remove all those defines that you add at build time and
leave only default values set inside sqlite3.c file?
Pavel
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Kuba Nowak wrote:
> Hello
>
> My problem
p://www.sqlite.org/changes.html
>
> Thanks,
> Mathias
>
>
>
> On Mon 18/04/11 16:05 , "Pavel Ivanov" paiva...@gmail.com sent:
>
>> I checked
>> the SQLite release notes and I could not find changes for sqlite3_step.
>> Should I upgrade anyway?
&g
9:54 AM, Spoerr Mathias wrote:
> Hello Pavel,
>
> thank you for your answer. SQLite Manager uses version 3.7.4, but I checked
> the SQLite release notes and I could not find changes for sqlite3_step.
> Should I upgrade anyway?
>
> Thanks,
> Mathias
>
>
>
> On
> Depending on the database size, it sometimes takes minutes to get a result.
> But when using the Firefox plugin "SQLite Manager", it "only" takes 1-2
> seconds.
>
> I use SQLITE Version 3.6.22.
Maybe SQLite Manager uses newer version of SQLite? Try to execute in
it "SELECT sqlite_version()"
You won't be able to insert. The statement will fail.
Pavel
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Adam DeVita wrote:
> Good day,
>
> What happens if you insert more than your RAM size into an in memory
> database?
> (I'm particularly interested in the Windows context).
>
> regards,
> Adam
>
Stefan,
> SQLite should'nt be called a "SQL database" (as e.g. touted on its homepage).
> Instead it should clearly declare itself as an "In-memory SQL
> Datastore" or a "Data container with SQL capabilities".
This is quite serious allegations. Making them you should explain what
they are based o
> Keep in mind that sqlite has a limit of 32 open databases.
32 _attached_ databases, not opened. With different sqlite3* handlers
you can open as many databases as you want (and your memory permits).
Pavel
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Eduardo wrote:
> At 18:11 06/04/2011, you wrote:
>>Tha
if it
worked this way.
Pavel
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>
>> > The fact that one engineer installed a site, began operating the app,
>> > then saw it become corrupt minutes later rules o
> The fact that one engineer installed a site, began operating the app,
> then saw it become corrupt minutes later rules out power loss or hard
> resets in at least that case. An operating system level problem should
> have been noticed by now given it's Windows XP... And the file is
> locally held
> If the 'COMMIT' reports that no transaction is active, why is the
> JOURNAL_MODE pragma still complaining about it being within a transaction?
> Am I missing something here?
Probably you have some not finalized SELECT statements still active.
To check that you can call sqlite3_close - it will fa
> * Which version of the source should I use? The amalgamized source
> isn't really useful
Why it's not useful for you if it contains all the functionality SQLite have?
> * Where are pages read and written? I found the page-cache, but not
> the functions that read/write those pages to disk.
You
301 - 400 of 1186 matches
Mail list logo
