ayoff_pick" immediately, but that because the deleting of
"Team_in_competition" is deferred until commit time, by that time the
commit happens there is no "Playoff_pick" to prevent the
"Team_in_competition" from being deleted.
Have I understood this right?
On 05/07/12 01:05, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Alan Chandler<a...@chandlerfamily.org.uk>wrote:
The commit referenced by that page:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/b23ae131874bc5c621f0
went into 3.7.9. So the problem was probably introduced in
3.7.9, not
On 04/07/12 18:52, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 07/04/2012 08:26 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
Due to hardware problems with my Debian Stable server, I have just
upgraded to Ubuntu-Server 12.04.
I have installed sqlite3 and when I ask it the version (with .version)
it replies
SQLite 3.7.9 2011-11-01 00:52
to have
been caused by a change made by 3.7.10, whereas this is 3.7.9 and given
its the version of choice in ubuntu it might be better to clarify
whether there is a problem there or not.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite
On 09/03/12 00:29, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Alan Chandler<a...@chandlerfamily.org.uk>wrote:
The complete database schema is here
https://github.com/akc42/**AKCMoney/blob/master/app/inc/**database.sql<https://github.com/akc42/AKCMoney/blob/master/app/inc/dat
On 08/03/12 23:32, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Alan Chandler<a...@chandlerfamily.org.uk>wrote:
I have been running a financial management application application I wrote
for a number of years. My "production" version runs on Debian stable
system as a r
On 08/03/12 22:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
I have been running a financial management application application I
wrote for a number of years. My "production" version runs on Debian
stable system as a result is running sqlite v3.7.3. My personal
development machine is running Debia
expect.
The other important aspect. If I don't use a view, but instead replace
"FROM dfxaction" with "FROM xaction" using the raw table then 3.7.10
delivers all the records I would expect.
So I am completely perplexed as to why there are changes between
behaviour. Can anyone
On 21/10/10 00:35, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> Alan Chandler<a...@chandlerfamily.org.uk> wrote:
>> Further to my other post related to attaching to databases with PHP PDO,
>> I have now managed to ATTACH OK
>>
>> However, when I come to DETACH, I am getting a Datab
SELECT
I don't really understand why I can't DETACH. Can anyone give me any
ideas what this could be.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
).
PS = I suppose it may be a php bug that it is using the v1 version of
prepare
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
tle time when its not encorporated back in.
For me, the biggest problem is having sufficiently recent versions of
all the code and libraries to support WAL mode. At least one host
(Bluehost) that I use can't handle that.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
_
ppen to be ordered - but that is an implementation detail.
Unless you use the ORDER BY clause the database may deliver the records
in any order it wishes. It is not forced to use the ID order.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users m
I seem to be doing plenty of
SELECT * FROM a LEFT JOIN b WHERE ...;
but looking at the syntax diagrams at
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html
it looks like I have to follow LEFT with OUTER.
Shouldn't the diagram allow OUTER to be bypassed?
--
Alan Chandler
http
On 14/10/10 17:28, Dan Kennedy wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
>> CREATE TABLE div_winner_pick (
...
>> PRIMARY KEY (cid,confid,divid,uid)
>> );
...
>>
>> CREATE INDEX div_win_pick_uid_cid_idx ON div_winner_pick (uid
ndex across a lesser number of columns (because I am querying
for all records that match where I can define the values "cid" and "uid"
in the example above) it is still and advantage to create it separately.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
ltiplying by 1000).
As a result, I almost always think about that approach as my first
choice when writing a new app.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bi
On 26/08/10 20:29, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 26/08/10 17:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
>> So someone can check it out. Try it with a VIEW that definitely doesn't
>> exist, or use
>>
>> CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS ...
>>
>
> As far as I can work it out,
aving completed that script and then
checking the schema with the command line sqlite3 utility, the view no
longer exists.
This seems completely wrong. Surely it should do this check at
*execute* time not at *prepare* time.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandl
On 26/08/10 13:38, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 26 Aug 2010, at 12:12pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
>> This time it reported that the view it would have created failed because
>> the table (view) already existed.
>
> I'm sorry to ask this, but can you check for us whether a
reading
this file
The dfxaction view is created almost at the end of this file.
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/snippets/database.sql.txt
(someone asked further down the thread whether the view really exists.
Yes it does and its not temporary).
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.ch
s are moderated, and others they see only when they are
members of a specific group - we used them as committee rooms).
There is a useable demo here
http://chat.hartley-consultants.com/
which is stand alone. The code can also link to an SMF forum and derive
username from the login identity of the use
On 24/07/10 15:41, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 24/07/10 14:18, J. King wrote:
>
>> PDO_sqlite3 also does have the advantage of being available by default
>> since PHP 5.0.0, whereas sqlite3 is only available by default since PHP
>> 5.3.0. I'm aware of no other advantages to
typical
web site) where there might be some locking issues.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
value
> where KEY = 0 from the COL1 value of the current row so that the result
> would be.
>
> 0, 0
> 1, 1
> 2, 2
> 3, 3
>
> Can this be done in SQL? It does not have to be one UPDATE/SELECT
> statement.
>
> Thank you
> pw
>
>
UPDATE table1
1 and at that point a writer does BEGIN
IMMEDIATE, SELECT3, UPDATE, COMMIT, and then I continue with SELECT2
COMMIT, will SELECT1 and SELECT2 have a consistent view of the database
unaffected by the UPDATE in the middle. In other words, is the Readers
view of how far up the WAL it is allowed to look
) on a version field on the database
to ensure its the same as when I originally read it, ROLLBACK if it
isn't, but if it is proceed with the INSERTS and UPDATES and finally
COMMIT).
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users
to managing locking do you take?
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
28 matches
Mail list logo
