Re: [sqlite] the speed of embedded database engines, sqlite3 vs berkeley db, I'm confused

sqlite3_bind_XXX() followed by sqlite3_step() > (and sqlite3_reset()), which will be _much_ faster than > sqlite3_exec(). > > -- > Matthew L. Creech > If he wants go faster he can use BEGIN TRANSACTION (EXCLUSIVE or other) before the 100,000 iterations. In this way sqlite do

Re: [sqlite] the speed of embedded database engines, sqlite3 vs berkeley db, I'm confused

lite3_bind_XXX() followed by sqlite3_step() > (and sqlite3_reset()), which will be _much_ faster than > sqlite3_exec(). > > -- > Matthew L. Creech > If he wants go faster he can use BEGIN TRANSACTION (EXCLUSIVE or other) before the 100,000 iterations. In this way sqlite do

Re: [sqlite] the speed of embedded database engines, sqlite3 vs berkeley db, I'm confused

lite3_bind_XXX() followed by sqlite3_step() > (and sqlite3_reset()), which will be _much_ faster than > sqlite3_exec(). > > -- > Matthew L. Creech > If he wants go faster he can use BEGIN TRANSACTION (EXCLUSIVE or other) before the 100,000 iterations. In this way sqlite do