>Have you tested using a transaction over your combined queries?
>Even for simple read operations this may give a huge performance difference.
Yes, we did. Not only for performance reasons but for "automatic cleanup" in
case of an error as well.
--
Peter
Thanks Bert,
You are right. Now the C++ example runs equaly fast. Looks like I have to
redesign the Db schema.
With regards,
Peter
>Where do you perform the query in the C++ code?
>
>Your C++ program shows how you prepare the statement 5000 times, but not how
>you execute it.
>
>The VB.Net
Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
>Thanks for the query. It's difficult to track down performance issues with
>System.Data.SQLite without seeing the C# (or VB.NET) example code as there are
>a variety of ways to query and process data using it.
>
>Is there any chance we could see the code that is using
query performance
>
>
>Kraijenbrink - FixHet - Systeembeheer wrote:
>>
>> 1. "SQLitePerfTest - C++ " runs very fast. 50.000 queries in 8 or 9
>seconds;
>>
>> 2. "SQLitePerfTest - VB.net runs very fast. 50.000 queries in 7 or 8
>seconds.
>
Hi,
I've created 3 test samples. A C++ (sqlite-amalgamation-3080600 .lib) and two
VB.NET variants (sqlite-netFx40-binary-x64-2010-1.0.94.0).
1. "SQLitePerfTest - C++ " runs very fast. 50.000 queries in 8 or 9 seconds;
2. "SQLitePerfTest - VB.net runs very fast. 50.000 queries in 7 or 8
"SQLitePerfTest - VB.net which runs slow, 50.000 queries in 5 or 6 minutes;
Thank you for your time and effort and hope to hear from you.
With regards,
Peter Kraijenbrink
FixHet - Systeembeheer
Geestdorp 22-II
3444 BD Woerden
Tel: 0348-410220
Gsm: 06 - 27231926
Web: www.fixhet
ering your question.
>
>On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Kraijenbrink - FixHet - Systeembeheer <
>kraijenbr...@fixhet.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've searched through this forum but couldn't find any related topic
>> regarding my question. I'm having seriou
Hi all,
I've searched through this forum but couldn't find any related topic regarding
my question. I'm having serious performance problems (queries up to 20/sec)
while running a SQLite query since i added a group_concat clause.
The query looks like:
SELECT
8 matches
Mail list logo