Both work for me, Kit solution is very fast, but I think John is right. In
my case, the tables have sequencial rowid. If I delete some row, then will
not work anymore.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM, John Machin wrote:
> On 20/08/2009 12:57 AM, Kit wrote:
> > Right form
I said its slow but I forget index. Now is as fast as a lightningbolt!!
Thanks again!
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Mário Anselmo Scandelari Bussmann <
mario.bussm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bingo! This works very well (a little bit slow, since I have a 30
> rows). T
Bingo! This works very well (a little bit slow, since I have a 30 rows).
Thank you all!!!
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:42 AM, John Machin <sjmac...@lexicon.net> wrote:
> On 20/08/2009 12:10 AM, Mário Anselmo Scandelari Bussmann wrote:
> > I have a table like this
I have a table like this:
petr4
---
rowid|data|preabe|premax|premin|preult|voltot
1|2007-01-02|50.0|50.45|49.76|50.45|256115409.0
2|2007-01-03|50.16|50.4|48.01|48.7|492591256.0
3|2007-01-04|48.5|48.75|47.4|47.65|505916186.0
4|2007-01-05|47.2|47.99|45.1|46.19|581485748.0
4 matches
Mail list logo