Le 29.04.2013 11:35, Joe Mistachkin a écrit :
Mathieu Schroeter wrote:
I downloaded the SQLite.NET.chm from the trunk in order to access the .NET
documentation but the pages are empty.
Actually, this is the result of a Windows security feature that disables
downloaded
content. To enable it
Hi,
I downloaded the SQLite.NET.chmfrom the trunk [1]in order to access the
.NET documentation but the pages are empty.
Regards,
Mathieu Schroeter
[1]:
http://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/doc/trunk/Doc/SQLite.NET.chm?mimetype=application/x-chm
"temp", db2, "temp");
Because (maybe) the temporary triggers on db1 are now broken... ? I must
drop all temporary things in db1 before sqlite3_backup_init() in the case
where the tables already exist? And what about my queries?
the next future.
Hi,
It works fine for me with a *Linux* Samba Server (SMB1). it is very bugged
with the SMB1, SMB2 and SMB2.1 provided by Microsoft. Even if the Oplocks
are disabled with SMB1.
--
Mathieu SCHROETER
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqli
data_in_the_table
/* for an index */
struct idx {
struct idx *next;
struct idx *prev;
...
const void *data; /* ptr on 'my_data_in_the_table' */
} *idx_foobar
To fix my problem then I must create my own high level index ...
Thanks everyone!
Mathieu
>
>
> Pavel
Le 20.10.2010 15:51, Drake Wilson a écrit :
> Quoth Mathieu Schroeter, on 2010-10-20 15:41:51 +0200:
>> Thanks for your interesting answer.
>>
>> The first plan looks the best but it does not explain the ORDER BY.
>> If I could done this job with pencil and pap
Le 20.10.2010 14:14, Igor Tandetnik a écrit :
> Mathieu Schroeter wrote:
>> Le 20.10.2010 12:32, Mathieu Schroeter a écrit :
>>> I've made a small program with this output (please, look at the
>>> attached C code _first_):
>>
>> Mmmh.. sorry but the p
Le 20.10.2010 12:32, Mathieu Schroeter a écrit :
I've made a small program with this output (please, look at
the attached C code _first_):
Mmmh.. sorry but the previous attached code has at least one error
and some parts commented. And now I see that without EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN,
the compa
does not show idx_foobar in the second query?
Is the index used? It seems that this index is used, because otherwise
more dot [.] should be printed between "step for first " and
"step for second ". No?
Thanks
Regards,
Mathieu SCHROETER
#include
#include
#include "sql
Jay A. Kreibich a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Mathieu SCHROETER scratched on the
> wall:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've a simple question about the bind functions. If it can
>> be realistic to have in the future, a way to bind a sub-query
>>
y, it suggests that a significant
time would be saved.
Regards,
Mathieu SCHROETER
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
11 matches
Mail list logo