Re: [sqlite] 18 minutes 41 seconds
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:07 AM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > On Monday, 30 December, 2019 19:29, Michael Falconer > wrote: > > > As we approach the end of yet another year ( and indeed decade ). > > Technically, every year is the end of a decade, if one means the immediately > preceding ten years. > > However, if you mean the end of the second decade of the 21st century, you > will have to wait another year for that. January 1st, 0001 AD was the first > day of the year 1. The first decade ended at the end of December 31st 0011 > AD, not December 31st, 0010 AD. (if following the proleptic Gregorian > calendar). Languages don't work like this. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/decade Cheers ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Many ML emails going to GMail's SPAM
Il giorno 21 novembre 2017, alle ore 15:30, Richard Hippha scritto: >On 11/21/17, Paul Sanderson wrote: >> Coincidence! I have just been in my gmail folder marking a load of SQLite >> email as 'not spam' >I've been seeing mailing list emails go to spam for a while now. >Nothing has changed with MailMan. I think what we are seeing is the >beginning of the end of email as a viable communication medium. >I really need to come up with an alternative to the mailing list. >Perhaps some kind of forum system. Suggestions are welcomed. I suggest that people check their spam folder daily. It takes a few seconds to manually approve the few false positives. Any web based thing otoh is a crawling horror which will destroy any usefulness in the whole thing. And they require an active connection which is not always available. IMHO ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] What does "The use of the amalgamation is recommended for all applications." mean, precisely?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Sidney Cadotwrote: > What I was wondering is whether the SQLite docs (written by you, I > presume) express a preference for using SQLite3 via inclusion of the > source (amalgamation) into ones project, vs. using a pre-compiled > library (as could be provided, for example, by a linux distribution). Separate files vs. amalgamation, and statically vs. dynamic linking of sqlite are two completely orthogonal issues. The manual section you quote refers only to the first of the two issue. With regard to the second issue, several experienced people, including Richard Hipp, have expressed the opinion in more than one occasion that statically linking sqlite avoids some problems that can happen otherwise. Evaluating the pro and the contra of the two choices for each particular project is a task that only the people involved in the project can perform. Hope this helps. P. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users