he manager. If a process opens a
file using FILE_FLAG_RANDOM_ACCESS, then it (or any other concurrent
process) that happens to access sequentially can grind the system to a
halt. Sounds like a nightmare for any install running an AVS or
backup.
Thanks for your help!
-Stan
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:15
that simply copying the file would
result in the same amount of memory being used, but it doesn't. I'm
going to head to a Windows forum to try to find out more about what's
happening, but the list users may want to be aware of this if they
plan on using large sqlite DBs with Windows 2008.
Thanks,
-Stan
e, AllocationSize: 0,
Impersonating: TESTBED9\Administrator"
"6:30:41.2837648
PM","sqlite3.exe","1988","IRP_MJ_CREATE","C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Vivisimo\bin\fake-cache.sqlt","SUCCESS","Desired
Access: Generic Read, Disposition: OpenIf,
t; exclusive transaction.
>
> Stan Bielski wrote:
>> Sorry for the repost, but the original thread was hijacked by another
>> list user. This is a serious problem IMHO; it looks like the DB can't
>> be backed-up without rendering the machine unusable if a query hits it
>>
(seemingly identical) to the amount of data copied since the
process opened the file.
Is there a workaround for this issue? Any assistance or info is appreciated.
Thanks,
-Stan
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080
the rest of the copy the OS will consume virtual memory
linear (seemingly identical) to the amount of data copied since the
process opened the file.
Is there a workaround for this issue? Any assistance or info is appreciated.
Thanks,
-Stan
___
sqlite-users
the
blob is bigger than memory...
Thanks,
-Stan
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Stan Bielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone care to take a guess what's going on here?
The problem is that you are thrashing. The working set
on the database file is exceeding the amount of memor
index, the total performance should
be better.
If I wait until after the inserts, the index will take less than a minute to
build. Unfortunately, that's not an option for this application :-(
-Stan
's storing the index? It seems to me that
something is doing random I/O, and I was hoping that if I could "force" the
index's pages to stay in the cache, then I'd be able to avoid that.
Any help is appreciated,
-Stan
O.K. This is what I need. Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/User-function-in-WHERE-clause-tf2009603.html#a5543377
Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
parameters in xFunc? E.g. what is it
"sqlite3_context"?
Thanks for your time.
Stan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/User-function-in-WHERE-clause-tf2009603.html#a5542532
Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
problem?
Thanks
Stan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WHERE-with-user-function-tf2015394.html#a5539399
Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
, IntValue) ?
And how to include MYFUNC to SQLite ?
... you see - troubles of a beginner :-).
Thanks
Stan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/User-function-in-WHERE-clause-tf2009603.html#a5535131
Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
Hi,
is there a way to create user function similar to LIKE?
I'd like to use my function in clause WHERE. E.g. this selection:
SELECT * FROM Table WHERE Name MYFUNCTION param
Param is integer.
Thanks
Stan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/User-function-in-WHERE-clause
15 matches
Mail list logo