On Apr 9, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Al Danial wrote:
I did try
SYNCHRONOUS=off but that didn't seem to have an effect; I'll
study the docs to make sure I've got it right.
This isn't surprising.
fsync() is largely a no-op on just about any operating system. It
doesn't actually guarantee that the bytes
There are also pragmas to control page size and in-memory caching.
You will want to play with those, as well. If SQLite is in the
middle of a transaction and you load it up with commands, it will
create a journal file in /tmp/ to start pages that don't fit in the
in-memory page cache (or
On Apr 2, 2005, at 5:32 PM, liigo wrote:
Thanks, but why not sqlite add a password to the database file?
There isn't much value in adding a password required to access the file.
The user could still easily see all of the data stored within the
SQLite file. SQLite is an embedded database file.
On Apr 1, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
For several months now, I've gotten similar errors when I run the
test on my PowerBook G4. For me, the set of tests that fail is
different from test run to test run, but they do seem to be
concentrated in the "*ioerr" tests for the most
On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:09 AM, Eric Hochmeister wrote:
I just noticed that a new version of SQLite 3.1.4 was up, so I
downloaded it and can't seem to get it to compile. I have
successfully been using previous versions of SQLite (3.1.3, 3.0.8,
etc.) and this is the first time I've received an issue
On Feb 21, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Curtis King wrote:
On 21-Feb-05, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK -- so, you are willing to accept the risk of non-recoverable
database corruption in the event of power outage or other kinds of
catastrophic system failure (including the plug being pulled on
On Feb 21, 2005, at 9:54 AM, James Berry wrote:
On Feb 21, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Curtis King wrote:
I noticed this as well, so I profiled my call and found sync was
taking forever. I removed the following fcntl call, rc = fcntl(fd,
F_FULLFSYNC, 0);. Performance was back to normal.
Here are some
On Feb 17, 2005, at 9:53 AM, H. Wade Minter wrote:
I'm playing around with some Python stuff, and was wondering if there
were any reasonably stable bindings for SQLite 3? I've got an
existing SQLite 3 database that I want to work against, so I'd rather
not drop back to SQLite 2?
I have been
On Feb 7, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong but I was under the impression that having 2
separate
connections to database (and while on subject I noticed that making
connection
via ADO.NET takes significant time measured in seconds rather than in
milliseconds)
On Jan 31, 2005, at 9:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true at all. In fact, from experience, the Linux OS is much more
full of holes than Windows. It appears most hate Microsoft so thier
OS gets the most virus and hackers. All I can say is we independently
did a test with Linux and
On Jan 23, 2005, at 8:11 AM, Jason Morehouse wrote:
We are currently using mysql. What is the comparison to opening a
database with sqlite vs connecting to the daemon with mysql? Our
current box has seen 300+ connections to the sql server at at once.
Can we expect that having 300 databases
The 'tcl_install' target of Makefile.in ignores the DESTDIR that may
have been specified as a part of the build.
The tclinstaller.tcl script should install the sqlite3 tcl hook in
DESTDIR/LIBDIR such that a build-for-packaging doesn't inadvertently
shove things into the installed system.
The
On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
If the 3.1 file is created with the auto-vacuum option enabled
("PRAGMA auto_vacuum = 1;"), then the database will appear read-only
to 3.0 clients. That's the only incompatibility.
OK -- can auto-vacuum be turned on within a database that was created
Under what circumstances is a file written by 3.1 incompatible with a
file written by 3.0?
thanks,
b.bum
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Jan 19, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Will Leshner wrote:
Bug #301 says that, because fcntl isn't supported for remove volumes
on OS X, SQLite can't acquire a lock, which, I think, pretty much
means you can't use SQLite databases that are on AFP or SMB volumes on
OS X. What would happen if I simply made
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Steve Milner wrote:
Hello List,
I am having a problem with SQLite erroring out on Mac OS X. I am
using 3.0.8. The problem happens when it tries to access a SAMBA/CIFS
shared database. In my testing Windows to Linux and Linux to Windows
worked fine, but Mac to Windows
On Dec 28, 2004, at 11:44 AM, D.W. wrote:
Is there a function that does what I have described?
[described... 'compact' the primary keys of a database so that there
are no unused gaps after a row or rows have been deleted]
No. And, generally, you really don't want to do that.
The primary keys
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:42 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
If we exit the process and then reopen the database in a new process,
all that memory is not reallocated.
Are you sure you have that right? What OS are you running?
Also, how are you checking to see if the memory was deallocated in the
first
18 matches
Mail list logo
