On Oct 15, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
> A mail server speaks SMTP for both inbound and outbound
That’s only useful if you’ve configured Fossil to integrate with a third-party
bidirectional SMTP server, which is *not* the only way to configure Fossil’s
email integration:
https
I think you're conflating things. A mail server speaks SMTP for both
inbound and outbound, IMAP/POP/webmail is all part of the user interface
stack... as would be the webforum component in any mailing list/web forum
scheme.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, 20:45 Warren Young, wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:
On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:04 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> On Monday, 14 October, 2019 14:18, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> Fossil Forums allow you to subscribe to email notifications. From the
>> reader’s perspective, it’s really very little different from the current
>> Mailman based scheme.
>
> The
On Monday, 14 October, 2019 14:18, Warren Young wrote:
>Fossil Forums allow you to subscribe to email notifications. From the
>reader’s perspective, it’s really very little different from the current
>Mailman based scheme.
The preceding paragraph is completely at odds with the following paragr
On Oct 11, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
>
> A mailing list suits me just fine. It works well and gets next to no spam. In
> addition, it's not yet another damn website I have to log into to use and
> remember my username/password for. And I don't care if it's not "modern”.
Fossil For
On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Brannon King wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that we
> upgrade to something more modern and secure like Sympa or mlmmj, or even a
> more drastic system upgrade to something like Redmine -- a project
> tracker + forum.
This is a really old argument, which we’ve had at
On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:41 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
> what is the reason that the SQLite mailing list archives...are private for
> members only in order to be read?
Probably because you can extract email addresses and real names from the
archives.
Harvesting of such information is a problem inhe
Brannon King wrote:
> [...] I'd like to propose that we upgrade to something more modern and
> secure like Sympa or mlmmj, or even a more drastic system upgrade to
> something like Redmine -- a project tracker + forum.
I would propose instead to upgrade to a NNTP. (I even wrote a NNTP software
t
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
> GNU Mailman is still very widely used and IMO does the job very well
Its web interface is like something from 1997. In particular, it makes reading
archives very painful, clicking through to one message at a time.
I’d recommend groups.io —
On 11 Oct 2019, at 16:56, Brannon King wrote:
> I agree that Mailman is archaic. I worry about the security on it. I don't
> enjoy using 3rd-party mirrors for searching it. I'd like to propose that we
> upgrade to something more modern and secure like Sympa or mlmmj, or even a
> more drastic syst
Are there specific Mailman CVEs you can refer towards such that these settings
could not be opened up? The read-only archives appear to be static files, so
there is no additional security issue that isn't already presented by the
existing cgi-bin already open for public access. Similarly for the
I agree that Mailman is archaic. I worry about the security on it. I don't
enjoy using 3rd-party mirrors for searching it. I'd like to propose that we
upgrade to something more modern and secure like Sympa or mlmmj, or even a
more drastic system upgrade to something like Redmine -- a project
tracke
Apologies if this has been asked before but what is the reason that the SQLite
mailing list archives, linked at
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users, are
private for members only in order to be read? The archives can be viewed at a
mirror such as http://sqlite.10
13 matches
Mail list logo
