On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> A foreign key which points to the same table had not occurred to me, outside
> of abstract mathematical exercises. I think you've come up with an
> acceptable example of why I felt reluctant to condemn the practise.
On 27 Oct 2014, at 9:11am, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> This seems to me to be an elegant solution, but I'd be curious to
> know if it would be considered badly designed for some reason, and
> would be interested to know what kind of alternatives people would
> propose.
[Changing subject line as this strays away from the original topic]
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 08:22 +, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2014, at 8:17am, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
> > Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> >> locateFKeyIndex() function issuing the not-so-informative
> >>
3 matches
Mail list logo