To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] False negatives from RTree
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ben Harper <b...@imqs.co.za> wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anybody ever seen anomalous behaviour on an R*Tree. Specifically, false
> negatives?
> I'm using Spatialite 2.4.0
org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Richard Hipp
Sent: 05 July 2011 03:20 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] False negatives from RTree
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ben Harper <b...@imqs.co.za> wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anybody ever s
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ben Harper wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anybody ever seen anomalous behaviour on an R*Tree. Specifically, false
> negatives?
> I'm using Spatialite 2.4.0 RC.
>
> What I end up with is a table into which I can insert new geometry, but
> that geometry does
Hi,
Has anybody ever seen anomalous behaviour on an R*Tree. Specifically, false
negatives?
I'm using Spatialite 2.4.0 RC.
What I end up with is a table into which I can insert new geometry, but that
geometry does not get retrieved by an appropriate RTree search.
Indeed, even a search which
4 matches
Mail list logo